AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

William D Whitaker

MATHB50 · MATHMATH · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
56/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you are comfortable with a strict, fast-paced math class and can keep up without much hand-holding.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrict ClassroomCares If You TryFast PacedFair GraderNot Beginner Friendly
  • Students describe Whitaker as strict, especially about classroom behavior.
  • One review praises his fairness and lecture notes, while another warns that he moves too fast for weaker math students.
  • He may work for disciplined students, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

48/100

A good grade seems possible for students who try, but the strict pace and limited question time make it hard for weaker math students.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The math content is not described as impossible, but the fast pace makes it challenging for students who lack confidence.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews mention strict classroom behavior rules but do not clearly prove an .

Only in-person reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendation depends on student fit because one student found him awesome and another advised .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

One student says he grades fairly, with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not described in detail, so the main burden appears to be pace and difficulty rather than assignment volume.

Format shift

Only in-person evidence exists and it gives limited workload detail.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

He is knowledgeable and caring when students try, but his fast pace and strict style weaken the experience for some students.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove whether .

Format shift

No format difference exists because both reviews are in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The but knowledgeable math instructor whose class can reward effort but may move too fast for struggling students.

Main concern

Students who need slower pacing or more question time may struggle.

What students said

“He grades fairly, his lectures notes are better than the book!!”
MATHMATH
“he goes over everything too fast, and allows no time for questions.”
MATHB50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If math is not .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 , and student fit. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“his lectures notes are better than the book!!”

⚖️

58/100

“He grades fairly”

⚠️ Pace Risk

45/100

“he goes over everything too fast, and allows no time for questions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is strict and scared me at the beg. but he really cares about students success, only if you try.
  • He can be rude, but only if you interrupt him.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He grades fairly
  • At first I thought there was no way of passing his class because he goes over everything too fast

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Fit

  • If math is not .
  • He is very strict about cell phones and talking in class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because only and they give mixed but limited detail.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATHB501 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values