AI Rate Professor

History

Jay Hargis

HISTB17A · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

unless and little support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor CommunicationUnclear AssignmentsSlow GradingHeavy WritingNot Helpful
  • and poor course organization.
  • Both reviews say responses and .
  • The course appears writing-heavy and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A looks costly because , and .

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course feels difficult because expectations and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

, and they do not discuss attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students mainly warn against the class because support, communication, and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students report very slow grading and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students describe the class as dominated by essays and paragraph-based assignments.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Teaching support is rated poorly because students describe unclear directions and useless help.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

15/100

The comments , and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

directions, slow responses, and weak help.

Main concern

Students may struggle to get timely guidance or .

What students said

“The directions regarding the class and .”
HISTB17A
“I kept asking him for help and he gave me useless answers.”
HISTB17A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The directions regarding the class and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“I kept asking him for help and he gave me useless answers.”

⚖️

25/100

“It took forever .”

📝 Workload Style

25/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Support

  • The directions regarding the class and .
  • I kept asking him for help and he gave me useless answers.

Theme 2

📨 About Communication

  • .
  • because he is a big slacker

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Only , but they are consistent about poor communication and support.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HISTB17A2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values