AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Carl Benjamin

MATHA · MATHBA · MATH50 · BABA · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
9/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

unless you want a very hard, exam-heavy class and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerExtremely Hard TestsPoor ExplanationsHarsh Exam GradingNot RecommendedHeavy Homework
  • Most reviews describe him as a poor teacher whose tests .
  • Grades appear heavily .
  • A few students found him cool or learned a lot, but the dominant experience is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

An A sounds very hard because exams, and effort did not guarantee passing for some students.

All ; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The course feels far harder than expected because , and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews mention class timing and early dismissal, but do not clearly prove a .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

14/100

Most students strongly warn against taking him because of , and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Grades appear dominated by difficult exams, and several students say .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report a lot of homework and significant study time, while .

Format shift

Workload evidence comes only from in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most students say he does not explain well, gets irritated, or teaches material differently from what appears on tests.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

Multiple reviews say exams are the main or only graded items, with but not meaningfully graded.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews overwhelmingly describe a and harsh testing.

Main concern

and often drive the whole grade.

What students said

“ and so you have to do good on them to pass.”
MATHBA
“ .”
MATHBA
“ .”
MATHBA

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are sometimes open-notes, but reviews describe them as very hard, grade-dominant, and poorly aligned with homework.

Open NotesNo CalculatorOnly Exams GradedHard TestsThree Tests

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention open notes, no calculator, only tests graded, and .

Open NotesNo CalculatorOnly Exams GradedHard TestsThree Tests
“He lets you use notes but it doesn't help.”
MATHBA
“only thing graded is the tests, theres 3.”
MATHBA
“Only good thing is he lets you use notes but no calculator at all”
MATHBA

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and so you have to do good on them to pass.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“ .”

⚖️

12/100

“only thing graded is the tests, theres 3.”

📈 Difficulty And Grades

12/100

“I got an F. And it wasn't for lack of effort.”

Theme 1

🧮 About Tests And Grades

  • and so you have to do good on them to pass.
  • can , but still very difficult.
  • .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He does not teach he justnputs things on the board
  • Hardley any instruction - other than altering the directions in the textbook. : (

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • .
  • I wish I could warn all of the --and tell them NO!!!
  • he was a hard teacher really mean

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

, repeated pattern of difficult tests and poor teaching.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATHBA12 reviews
MATHA3 reviews
BABA1 review
MATH501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values