AI Rate Professor

English

Stephen Frye

ENGL475 · ENG395 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you are comfortable with theme-driven English classes and limited review evidence.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTheme-heavy teachingMixed clarityLiterature focus driftAccessible materialsSparse evidence
  • One review says the class drifted away from literature into spiritual and philosophical themes.
  • One older review calls him a great teacher and notes that syllabi are posted online.
  • The evidence is too sparse and mixed for a strong recommendation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

There is not enough grade evidence to call it easy, but the reported difficulty is moderate rather than extreme.

All evidence comes from two in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The content seems moderate, but one review says the thematic framing made it hard to focus on the literature.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

No online or .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation depends on fit because one student praises him while another says the class focus was frustrating.

The mixed recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Reviews , so as unclear and probably standard.

Format shift

No online or .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Workload evidence is limited, but one review mentions theme-driven assignments without describing overload.

Format shift

, and workload detail is sparse.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Teaching experience is mixed but leans weak because the more detailed review says the course lost focus.

Format shift

All teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention assignments but do .

Format shift

, and assessment evidence is limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

course experience and a brief positive teaching review.

Main concern

The class may prioritize spiritual or philosophical framing over the assigned literature.

What students said

“This class was taught as a spiritual English class.”
ENG395
“we lost focus of the actual stories.”
ENG395
“Great teacher”
ENGL475

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, proctoring policy, or .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or proctoring policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“we lost focus of the actual stories.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, course focus, and materials. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“It was hard for us to focus on the literature”

👍 Recommendation Fit

42/100

“Great teacher”

📚 Course Focus

48/100

“he was so focused on incorporating the ideas of transcendentalism and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This class was taught as a spiritual English class.
  • Great teacher

Theme 2

📚 About Course Focus

  • It was hard for us to focus on the literature
  • we lost focus of the actual stories.
  • Most of us have no interest in either of these topics.

Theme 3

🗂️ About Course Materials

  • he posts all of his syllabui on csub.edu under his faculty website :)
  • he was so focused on incorporating the ideas of transcendentalism and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, and they conflict while giving limited detail on grading or assessments.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG3951 review
ENGL4751 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values