AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

David Arthur

PHILOX · PHILB7LOGIC · PHILB7 · PHIL201 · LOGIC · B7 · PHILSOPHYB11 · PHILB12 · PHIL37 · PSYCHB7 · PHIL7 · PHILOSOPHY · PHIL10 · PHIL12 · PHILOSOPHYB12 · PHIL · 62 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take him if and are willing to attend class, do homework, and study for .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear LecturesHelpful When AskedHard TestsExtra CreditMixed Strictness
  • Students repeatedly say he made difficult philosophy and logic material easier to understand.
  • Getting an A , and using review guides rather than minimal effort.
  • Opinions on personality and , but the strongest pattern is that many students found him valuable and memorable.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A was very reachable with , and studying, but many reviews reject the idea of a free A.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The philosophy and logic content was often difficult, but students say .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

and lecture value, but reviews do not clearly prove a strict mandatory policy.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Most detailed reviews recommend him for , and useful support despite hard tests.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

but not soft, with several students warning that tough grader.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The , and occasional quizzes, with effort needed but not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students describe him as , and strong at breaking down difficult concepts, though a minority found him moody or unclear.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and , so assessment appears mixed with a meaningful exam component.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

courses could feel easy with steady work but hard when students skipped homework or studying.

Main concern

Tests and clear.

What students said

“The subject can be difficult, but the .”
PHILB7
“His class was not an easy A; you had to work for it but .”
PHIL12
“He also gives great review guides for exams and .”
PHILB7

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and dropped quizzes, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, midterm format, or final format.

Hard TestsExam Review GuidesDropped Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and review guides were useful, but exam policy details are not clearly proven.

Hard TestsExam Review GuidesDropped Quizzes
“ , but .”
PHILB7
“He also gives great review guides for exams and .”
PHILB7
“He drops 2 quizzes and .”
PHILB7

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The subject can be difficult, but the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ !”

📈 Effort For Grades

68/100

“His class was not an easy A; you had to work for it but .”

⚖️

48/100

“ , but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes a difficult subject easy to understand.
  • and structured approach to teaching the lesson.
  • but the class is hard.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • , and make sure you can answer the review guide questions and you will get an A.
  • As long as you keep up, easy A class--but you must study.
  • David is a .

Theme 3

❤️ About Student Experience

  • .
  • I highly recommend David Arthur as the teacher.
  • Would have liked a different professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

62

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 in-person reviews across several years with consistent , and difficult tests.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 510
3 out of 56
2 out of 54
1 out of 513

Course coverage

PHILB714 reviews
PHILB127 reviews
PHIL5 reviews
LOGIC4 reviews
PHIL124 reviews
Show 11 more courses
PHIL103 reviews
PHILOSOPHY3 reviews
PHIL72 reviews
B71 review
PHIL2011 review
PHIL371 review
PHILB7LOGIC1 review
PHILOSOPHYB121 review
PHILOX1 review
PHILSOPHYB111 review
PSYCHB71 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values