AI Rate Professor

Not Specified

Leticia Lentz

ACDVB50 · READING · ACDV52 · ACDV50 · ACDVACDV · ACDV68 · ACDV1 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want structure and extra-credit chances, but expect reading and a stricter classroom style.

Best fit · Effort For RewardExtra CreditLots Of ReadingStrict But HelpfulImproves Study SkillsMixed Experiences
  • Many students , and makes them better students.
  • The class often requires reading, projects, essays, and steady work.
  • and students who engage.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

and , but students still need to read and complete steady work.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

54/100

The subject is not described as conceptually brutal, but reading, projects, essays, and strict expectations raise the challenge.

Only in-person reviews exist, so course easiness is based entirely on that format.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly mention .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

Most students recommend her because she helps them improve, though a minority report harsh or unhelpful experiences.

Recommendation and is mostly positive but not unanimous.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

is mentioned repeatedly, but at least one student felt the .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and grading evidence centers on and mixed fairness claims.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Students mention lots of reading, projects, essays, and hard work, though some say the assignments are not complicated.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Many students , and growth-focused, while a few describe her as mean or unhelpful.

Format shift

Teaching and is mostly positive with .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments emphasize reading, projects, essays, presentations, assignments, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and assessment evidence is assignment-heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

but often helpful teacher whose classes reward consistent work and .

Main concern

Some students found her mean, boring, unhelpful, or harder than expected.

What students said

“She gives lots of opportunities to get .”
ACDVB50
“Lots of reading but .”
ACDVB50
“She made the class hard”
ACDV50

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Ms. Lentz made me a better student. She taught me how to study and better prepare.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Ms. Lentz made me a better student.”

📈 Grade Path

76/100

“She gives lots of opportunities to get .”

📚 Workload

48/100

“Lots of reading but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a her.
  • Very Helful.& .
  • she can be extremely unhelpful
  • MEAN

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Her classes are mede to get an easy "A".
  • do the work, get a good grade.
  • She gave me a C for my grade but I deserved a high B.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • You need to read, and do a lot of work.
  • LOTS OF READING BUT FUN TO HAVE PRESENTATIONS.
  • She made the class do so many projects and essays

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews give recurring themes over several years, but the data is old and some comments are vague or extreme.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ACDVB505 reviews
ACDV503 reviews
ACDV11 review
ACDV521 review
ACDV681 review
Show 2 more courses
ACDVACDV1 review
READING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values