AI Rate Professor

English

Sue Granger-Dickson

ENG2 · STDVB6 · STDV6 · ENGLB2 · ENGB2 · STDVB2 · STDVSECT · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you value a and can handle occasional long lectures or heavier English work.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring MentorVery HelpfulFuture FocusedSometimes IntenseOccasionally Disorganized
  • Most students praise her kindness, support, and genuine interest in student success.
  • Study , while English courses can feel intense or unclear.
  • The strongest concern is workload and organization in some sections.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Some classes seem easy, but English reviews say grades depend on keeping up and turning work in on time.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

, while English and critical thinking work can be intense or dense.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they differ by course type.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

The , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Most students recommend her because she is caring and helpful, though a few criticize organization and specificity.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

because students can earn strong grades by submitting work on time, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Workload varies by course, from very light study skills classes to intense English sections with demanding papers.

Format shift

In-person reviews show clear course-to-course workload differences.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Most students describe her as caring, helpful, and gifted, while a few find her boring or disorganized.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in-person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews mention papers, schedules, exercises, and turning work in on time more than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss assessment, and no online assessment evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are mostly very positive, especially about her care and helpfulness, but some English students report heavy or .

Main concern

English sections may feel intense, workload-heavy, or .

What students said

“She seems so genuine and she wants to see you succeed.”
STDVB6
“Wonderful teacher but very hard and expects a lot of you.”
ENG2
“ never very specific.”
ENGB2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She just has a big heart and cares for each and every one of her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in support, workload, and teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“She just has a big heart and cares for each and every one of her students.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

80/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Balance

52/100

“You just have to be ready for the work load.”

Theme 1

❤️ About Support

  • She seems so genuine and she wants to see you succeed.
  • Extremely helpful and nice.
  • She's not just a counselor but a friend who's interested in seeing you succeed.

Theme 2

📚 About Difficulty

  • Wonderful teacher but very hard and expects a lot of you.
  • It seems impossible when you first look at the schedule, but you can come out unscathed.
  • It was a lot of info to digest and there .

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • An excellent instructor.
  • Disorganized and a little too self actualized.
  • She has very strong critical thinking abilities, and expertly guides each student through the critical think

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve reviews provide useful detail, but they are old and split across different course types.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG25 reviews
STDVB62 reviews
ENGB21 review
ENGLB21 review
STDV61 review
Show 2 more courses
STDVB21 review
STDVSECT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values