AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Cherry Sills

CHDVB53A · CHDVB53 · CHDVB20 · CHDV53A · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

unless and very little instructor support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor CommunicationUnclear AssignmentsSlow GradingAbsent InstructorNot Recommended
  • Students repeatedly complain that .
  • Assignments are described as unclear and slow to appear or be graded.
  • Even when the course content is easy, the instructor experience is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

The content may be easy, but , and poor communication make earning an A frustrating.

All counted evidence is in person because the supplied online review count is zero.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

One review says the introductory material is easy and self-explanatory, but poor instruction makes the experience harder.

All counted evidence is in person, though some comments describe courses as online.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

Only in-person-counted reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Students strongly discourage taking her because , and slow with course management.

All recommendation evidence is from reviews counted as in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

, and late-work issues were reportedly not handled with consideration.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The workload itself is not described as heavy, but and delays create extra effort.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students consistently describe poor , and instructor absence.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Complaints focus on assignments, assignment directions, late posting, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Authoritative format counts classify all analyzed reviews as in person, but the comments , and .

Main concern

Students report little response from the instructor and .

What students said

“She is not specific about directions on assignments, waits a very long period of .”
CHDVB53
“ .”
CHDV53A
“never called or emailed back”
CHDVB20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on assignments and communication problems, and do not clearly prove exam .

Exam Policy Not Clearly ProvenAssignments Emphasized

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and mainly discuss assignments.

Exam Policy Not Clearly ProvenAssignments Emphasized
“She is not ”
CHDVB53
“she is ”
CHDVB53A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“No offense, but she is one of the . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫 Recommendation Risk

10/100

“So .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

15/100

“ .”

📬 Communication

12/100

“I have emailed her a couple of times and no response.”

Theme 1

📬 About Communication

  • I have emailed her a couple of times and no response.
  • .
  • never called or emailed back

Theme 2

📝 About Assignments

  • She is not
  • she is
  • .

Theme 3

🚫 About Overall Experience

  • So .
  • she is one of the .
  • she disappeared from the face of this earth in the middle of the semester

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

56/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed and highly consistent in their negative pattern.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHDV53A1 review
CHDVB201 review
CHDVB531 review
CHDVB53A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values