AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Diana Connolly

COMSBCOMS · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Avoid unless you have no alternative and can learn the material independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnpreparedPoor TeachingLow Confidence
  • The only review describes the teacher as the .
  • The main complaint is total lack of preparation.
  • There is no reliable .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

There is no grade evidence, and poor preparation likely makes earning an A harder despite the low difficulty rating.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The course content itself is not described as hard, but the teaching quality creates learning friction.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only student response is a .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

.

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe workload.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

The only review calls the teacher the worst and totally unprepared.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove whether .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The and focuses on poor preparation.

Main concern

The instructor appears unprepared.

What students said

“ . Totally unprepared.”
COMSBCOMS

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The format or policy.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Totally unprepared.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“ . Totally unprepared.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • . Totally unprepared.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

15/100

Evidence confidence

Only one old and , so confidence is low despite its strong tone.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COMSBCOMS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values