AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Michael O'Malley

PHILB7 · PHILOB12 · PHILOB6A · PHILB12 · PHIL7 · PHILB6A · PHILO101 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
76/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you like discussion-heavy philosophy and can manage studying without .

Best fit · Effort For RewardInteresting discussionsClear explanationsFunny lecturerUneven gradingModerate effort
  • Students , and and logic.
  • Grades usually require studying quizzes, tests, and .
  • A few , and heavy online-style workload despite all counted reviews being in person.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

Students say you can do fine by doing the work and studying, but and .

All counted evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online reviews to compare.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The subject can feel difficult, but and discussions make it manageable for students who keep up.

All , so format differences cannot be assessed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly state an , though class participation and lectures seem important.

All counted evidence is from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

and lively discussion, but grading complaints make the recommendation less universal.

All counted evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online reviews to compare.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

One review mentions a curve, but , and late grade updates.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

, but , and one heavy workload complaint keep it moderate.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

76/100

, and discussion-focused, though a few find him mediocre or .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

65/100

Reviews repeatedly mention quizzes, tests, and a .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive about teaching and and workload.

Main concern

Grades and .

What students said

“This guy can teach logic to anyone.”
PHIL7
“he never so you never know how well your doing.”
PHILB7

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, tests, and papers but do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or closed-book requirements.

QuizzesTestsPaper

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tests, but exam policy details are not clearly proven.

QuizzesTestsPaper
“as long you review for tests.”
PHILB12
“Just study the quizes, and do the paper.”
PHILB7

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This guy can teach logic to anyone.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

76/100

“He's great at explaining things and answering questions.”

👍 Recommendation Level

72/100

“ his course.”

⚖️

42/100

“he never so you never know how well your doing.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His lectures are extremely interesting.
  • He is good at what he does and .
  • This guy can teach logic to anyone.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Philosophy seems like a hard subject, but if you do the work in O'Malley's class you will do fine
  • Dr Mike also graded my class on a curve- and I was able to get a B.
  • Very difficult & a lot of work.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • he never so you never know how well your doing.
  • he hasn't shown us grades till now..class is almost over &

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Ten older reviews give consistent teaching themes but limited modern detail and no grade distribution.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHILB123 reviews
PHILB72 reviews
PHIL71 review
PHILB6A1 review
PHILO1011 review
Show 2 more courses
PHILOB121 review
PHILOB6A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values