AI Rate Professor

English

D. Decker

ENGENG · ENGSECT · ENGA1 · ENG1 · ENGLIB1 · ENGLISH1 · ENGLIB60 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
53/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you are ready to work independently and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerSerious workloadSelf-directed learningMixed clarityAttendance requiredUseful for motivated writers
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with some students praising his writing instruction and .
  • Students repeatedly say , and completed assignments.
  • He may benefit motivated English students but is risky for students who need direct guidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

A good grade seems possible, but only if , and .

All A-effort evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The content is not described as impossible, but the pace, responsibility, and .

, and they range from manageable to very challenging.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

One and completed assignments are required.

The .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

but warn against taking him if you need more support.

All , and it is strongly mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Reviews suggest students can pass or earn good grades by doing the work, but .

Format shift

as effort-based rather than lenient; no online evidence exists.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Students mention homework, class participation, studying, and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Some students praise his thoroughness and writing expertise, while and indirect.

Format shift

comparison available.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments emphasize homework, participation, and completed assignments more than exams.

Format shift

and participation, while online evidence is absent.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

help serious writers but frustrates students who need direct answers.

Main concern

Several students felt they had to teach themselves or could not get direct answers.

What students said

“Attendance and .”
ENGA1
“ if you have a problem in english because you will end up teaching yourself.”
ENGSECT

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and attendance but .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Attendance and .”
ENGA1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Take his class if you're ready, and I advice you to not if you aren't.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, effort, and student fit. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“I really enjoyed Mr. Decker's teaching style.”

📈 Difficulty & Effort

55/100

“To get a good grade you do have to apply all that he teaches you.”

⚠️ Main Risk

35/100

“I felt I was teaching myself.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Never answers questions directly.
  • Mr. Decker was thorough and alowed for ample questions.
  • I really enjoyed Mr. Decker's teaching style.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • To get a good grade you do have to apply all that he teaches you.
  • Attendance and .
  • Do what you're suppose to do and you'll pass this class.

Theme 3

🧭 About Student Fit

  • Take his class if you're ready, and I advice you to not if you aren't.
  • if you have a problem in english because you will end up teaching yourself.
  • Students who will go to four year colleges will benefit alot from his class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Eight old reviews give a useful but dated pattern, with consistent themes about responsibility and mixed teaching clarity.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENGENG2 reviews
ENG11 review
ENGA11 review
ENGLIB11 review
ENGLIB601 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGLISH11 review
ENGSECT1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values