AI Rate Professor

Physical Education

Matthew Hurst

Courses not reported · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Hurst looks like a strong low-difficulty choice, but the evidence is too sparse for high confidence.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyGreat instructorVery easyLow stress
  • The only review calls Hurst a great instructor.
  • The reported difficulty is very low.
  • Evidence is extremely limited because there .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

The difficulty rating is very low, but the comment gives no direct grade or workload proof.

All because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

The course appears easy based on the very low difficulty rating, though the comment gives little detail.

Only in-person evidence exists, and it is positive but sparse.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The .

There are no online reviews, and the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

The only student comment is positive, but it is too brief to support a stronger recommendation.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

There is , so leniency cannot be strongly inferred.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

The low difficulty rating suggests a light course, but the comment does not describe workload.

Format shift

Workload evidence .

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

The only student directly calls him a great instructor.

Format shift

Teaching evidence comes .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review .

Format shift

Neither format provides assessment details.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The and reports very low difficulty.

Main concern

The review .

What students said

“Great instructor”
008

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The policy.

Exam policy not clearly proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great instructor”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the limited teaching signal. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Great instructor”

👍 Recommendation Signal

80/100

“Great instructor”

📉 Low Difficulty

80/100

“Great instructor”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great instructor

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Great instructor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only one , so confidence is low despite the positive rating.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

0081 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values