AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Jesus Gaytan

PSYCB1A · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want discussion and critical engagement, but avoid him if .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerParticipation heavyEngaging discussionsReading requiredMixed grading clarityCaring but firm
  • Most students praise the engaging, discussion-based class and Gaytan's care for learning.
  • One and unclear instructions.
  • The course is not seen as very hard, but , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

48/100

The class is not very hard, but participation, reading, writing, and .

All evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is the course easy?

Standard

57/100

Students describe the material as interesting and not too hard, but , and writing keep it from being easy.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Participation matters repeatedly, so .

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

Two students recommend the class for engaging learning, but .

Recommendations .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Grading is disputed, with one review calling it inconsistent and unfair despite another .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The workload centers on reading, participation, and some writing, which students describe as manageable but real.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Gaytan is often described as caring, smart, and discussion-oriented, but one student found him dismissive and disorganized.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize participation, reading, writing, and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show an engaging participation-based course with strong learning value but .

Main concern

and fairness are inconsistent across reviews.

What students said

“His class revolves a lot around participation but the professor does a great job in bringing in the conversations.”
PSYC-B1A
“Professor Gaytan is inconsistent and .”
PSYC-B1A
“This professor wants you to critically engage with the coursework and its ideas.”
PSYC-B1A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the , or final format.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring rules, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The class isn't hard, but and disorganized.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“Topics are compelling and the professor genuinely cares about everyone's learning.”

⚖️

34/100

“Professor Gaytan is inconsistent and .”

👍 Recommendation Level

64/100

“One of the best classes that I have taken and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His class revolves a lot around participation but the professor does a great job in bringing in the conversations.
  • This professor wants you to critically engage with the coursework and its ideas.
  • he's really smart and lighthearted but firm on what to do and what to read.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class isn't hard, but and disorganized.
  • Instructions change often, and .
  • it's not that and writing

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Topics are compelling and the professor genuinely cares about everyone's learning.
  • He can be dismissive when questioned.
  • super cool.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because but conflicting views.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSYC-B1A3 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1