AI Rate Professor

English

Tarango Abraham

ENG100 · ENGL100 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
24.14%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless and manage assignments independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear gradingPoor communicationHeavy writing loadDisorganized classesFunny but inconsistent
  • Most recent in-person reviews , and frequent confusion.
  • Online reviews are much more positive and describe an easier path to an A, but and weak communication.
  • The course can feel easy in content, but the grading and organization make the A feel risky.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Online students report an easy grade, but the dropped outcomes, and high stress.

Online evidence suggests an easy A, while and stressful.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The English content is not described as intellectually advanced, but unclear lectures and be.

Online reviews describe straightforward work, while and unclear assignment structure.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Some reviews say he cancels or misses class often, but there is .

The ; online reviews do not clearly discuss attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Most recent in-person students strongly discourage taking him because of disorganization, poor communication, and .

Online students are more likely to recommend him, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

20/100

Many students report , and low grades despite the course seeming simple.

Format shift

Online grading is described as easier, while as unclear and harsh.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews repeatedly mention many papers, weekly work, quizzes, essays, and .

Format shift

Online workload sounds lighter, while as heavy and stressful.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Comments often describe missed classes, dense or , and .

Format shift

Online comments are mixed but acceptable, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Students mention essays, discussion boards, quizzes, and some test-heavy experiences rather than one single dominant assessment type.

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes essays and discussions, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

26 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, missed classes, delayed feedback, and heavy writing stress.

Main concern

Students often feel unsupported and unsure what is expected.

What students said

“There's a lack of out expectations on their own.”
ENGL100
“There is a lot of , and .”
ENG100
“Seriously the ”
ENGL100

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are more favorable, with students describing easy assignments and grades but .

Main concern

Grades and responses may arrive very late.

What students said

“His online course was super easy and chill.”
ENG100
“Make because it's straightforward to get an A if you do that.”
ENGL100
“He , so we were left wondering how we were doing.”
ENGL100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes, essays, and an , but they do not clearly prove a .

QuizzesEssaysUnclear final format

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and , but do not clearly prove standard proctoring or closed-book rules.

QuizzesTest heavyUnclear final format
“He didn't give out a ”
ENGL100
“there are quizzes, essays, and .”
ENG100

Online

Online reviews mention assignments, discussions, and essays, but do not clearly .

EssaysDiscussion boards
“Couple of essays and discussions.”
ENGL100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There's a lack of out expectations on their own.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Seriously the ”

⚖️

20/100

“grades w/out rubrics and there's no examples”

📚 Workload Stress

25/100

“There is a lot of , and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You're essentially on your own though as the lectures can be frustratingly dense
  • He talks a lot, but he is very engaging.
  • No real notes no textbook.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • was a .
  • His online course was super easy and chill.
  • Make because it's straightforward to get an A if you do that.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • Doesn't put .
  • .
  • dismissing classes early (sometimes after only 5 minutes), not showing up to class without notice

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 29 reviews span many years and recent comments are detailed, though some appear repetitive or possibly review-bombed.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 521

Course coverage

ENGL10019 reviews
ENG10010 reviews

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

5

C 5

D range

1

D+ 1

F

8

F 8

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Rather not say 3