AI Rate Professor

Biology

Annamaria Crescimanno

BIO220L · ANATOMY · 220BIO · BIO220 · BIOG110 · BIO100L · BIOLG220 · BIOG100 · G220 · 99 lifetime ratings

AI rating
89/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
83.87%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you want a highly supportive anatomy professor and are ready to study consistently.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear anatomy teachingCaring supportHeavy memorizationFair examsAttendance matters
  • Students overwhelmingly praise her clear, caring teaching in a demanding anatomy course.
  • An A is realistic with steady studying, lecture focus, and use of study guides or objectives.
  • The main risk is falling behind because the material is dense and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Many students earn A grades, but comments repeatedly say the A , and using her lecture materials.

Both formats support an effort-for-reward pattern, with online reviews especially emphasizing objectives and .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Anatomy is repeatedly described as dense, memorization-heavy, and sometimes fast-paced even though .

In-person and online reviews both describe difficult content, while making it manageable.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

as formally mandatory, but many reviews say skipping class makes success much harder.

In-person reviews provide most attendance evidence, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students strongly recommend her because she makes a hard anatomy course clearer, fairer, and more supportive.

Both formats are mostly positive, but and more enthusiastic.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

66/100

Grading is usually described as fair with , and some points returned when many students miss a question.

Format shift

, while online reviews include one complaint about no rounding.

Workload

Heavy

31/100

The workload is heavy because students describe lots of memorization, studying, objectives, lab quizzes, and .

Format shift

Both formats describe high effort, with online summer and pandemic reviews noting compressed pacing and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Most students describe her as , and unusually strong at explaining anatomy.

Format shift

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly positive, and online reviews are also mostly positive with a few concerns about responsiveness.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

76/100

Reviews repeatedly emphasize , and test preparation more than projects or papers.

Format shift

Both formats point toward exam-heavy assessment, with online reviews explicitly mentioning exams and objectives.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and fair exams while warning that anatomy is dense and attendance is important.

Main concern

The course has heavy memorization and students who miss class or fall behind struggle.

What students said

“The class material is definitely heavy and difficult, but she does an amazing job at explaining everything and answering any questions.”
BIO220
“It is a difficult class and requires lots of memorization so be prepared to study.”
BIO220

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students usually praise her clarity and support, but describe anatomy as , and effort-dependent.

Main concern

Online anatomy can move quickly and .

What students said

“Anatomy is not easy, but she provides you with resources and gives you leveled objectives to be successful in the exam.”
BIOLG220
“Class was online but she was awesome. but bearable.”
BIO220

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually described as fair and lecture-based but difficult because the anatomy content is dense.

Fair ExamsDifficult TestsStudy GuidesLeveled ObjectivesLab Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe fair but , and , but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Fair TestsDifficult TestsStudy GuidesLab Quizzes
“Her tests are difficult which is to be expected for anatomy classes, but ”
220BIO
“ as long as you do the study guides and study!”
BIO220

Online

and based on leveled objectives, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Heavy ExamsLeveled ObjectivesReview Zoom Sessions
“Study the leveled objectives on every chapter slide, they make up 99% of the exam.”
BIOLG220
“ but bearable.”
BIO220

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Anatomy is a difficult course but she helps you manage it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“The way she teaches and simplifies the subject makes it so we can succeed.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

88/100

“ up for class!”

📚 Effort Required

68/100

“If you keep up and put in the work, she'll definitely support you all the way.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures are exciting (mostly) and she always has a great visual or a metaphor for us to understand the concepts.
  • and outline to fill out while listening to her in class.
  • She knows a TON about anatomy and is amazing at presenting the mater.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There is a lot of material to cover, and you really have to stay on top of it.
  • Her tests are difficult which is to be expected for anatomy classes, but
  • You must want the A in order to get it and lots of studying!!

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • You can truly tell that she wants her students to succeed in her class
  • and enthusiastic in .
  • She's more than willing to help out.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

99

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is based on 50 reviews across many years, consistent themes, detailed comments, and both online and in-person evidence.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 580
4 out of 57
3 out of 53
2 out of 55
1 out of 55

Course coverage

BIO22021 reviews
220BIO11 reviews
ANATOMY7 reviews
BIOLG2203 reviews
2202 reviews
Show 5 more courses
BIO100L2 reviews
BIO220L1 review
BIOG1001 review
BIOG1101 review
G2201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

29

A+ 4 · A 23 · A- 2

B range

9

B+ 3 · B 6

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 4