AI Rate Professor

English

Claudia Jereb

ENGLISHG110 · ENG110 · G114 · ENGLISH100 · ENGL110 · ENGLISH099 · ENG100 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
65.63%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take her if and can attend consistently, but avoid her if strict participation and .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEssay HeavyStrong FeedbackStrict AttendanceTough GraderCaring Support
  • , and writing support, especially in newer reviews.
  • , and attendance, which can punish unprepared students.
  • Negative reviews describe strict attendance, nitpicky grading, limited flexibility, and a high-school-like classroom feel.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is achievable for students , and write at a solid college level.

and revisions, while in-person students more often warn that attendance and participation affect grades.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The content is not highly technical, but , and pass.

Online reviews focus on writing workload, while in-person reviews , and discussion.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

, and participation are strict and grade-relevant.

The ; online reviews do not clearly prove attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

Students recommend her for feedback and support, but the recommendation drops for students .

Online reviews lean more positive overall, while because attendance and classroom style matter more.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Essay grading is often described as tough or nitpicky, though .

Format shift

Both formats mention tough essay grading, with in-person reviews adding participation and attendance pressure.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The , and revisions, with some students calling it reasonable and others calling it too much.

Format shift

Online reviews describe manageable but , while and attendance demands.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Many students describe her as caring, knowledgeable, and helpful, but older negative reviews report confusion, rigidity, and poor fit.

Format shift

Recent reviews in both formats are more positive, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment , and occasional quizzes rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize essays and discussions, while , and in-class essay work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and complaints about strict attendance, heavy participation, and tough essays.

Main concern

Attendance and participation rules can strongly affect the experience.

What students said

“ , so do not miss class!”
ENG110
“She Makes an effort to meet with her students one on one.”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews and support, but writing-heavy expectations and strict essay revision can frustrate some students.

Main concern

and repeated revisions can feel harsh.

What students said

“Majority of the class was writing essays but honestly with .”
ENG100
“She likes to edit everything, I mean EVERYTHING.”
ENGL110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention essays, pop quizzes, and , but do not clearly prove a .

In-Class Essays MentionedPop Quizzes MentionedExam Prep Materials

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and prep materials, but do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy.

Pop QuizzesIn-Class EssaysExam Prep Materials
“ if you read the material.”
ENG110
“There are 4 essays, the midterm and .”
ENG100

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a teacher that you can rely on to help you.”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“ and is willing to help with anything.”

⚖️

34/100

“Prof Jereb was seriously one of the harshest graders I have had in a long time.”

🕒

18/100

“ , so do not miss class!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is a teacher that you can rely on to help you.
  • She is a very passionate and students with plenty of study material to prepare for essays.
  • I did not feel that I learned anything in this class.

Theme 2

✍️

  • Majority of the class was writing essays but honestly with .
  • She is a , and her feedback is sometimes opinion based rather than actual criticism.
  • She likes to edit everything, I mean EVERYTHING.

Theme 3

📌 About Rules & Participation

  • Participation is very important and will help your grade.
  • she is very strict with attendance, can't be even 30 sec late.
  • No flexibility with attendance.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

The 40 reviews cover online and in-person formats across many years and include , and feedback.

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 57
1 out of 57

Course coverage

ENG10013 reviews
ENG11011 reviews
ENGL11010 reviews
ENGLISH1003 reviews
ENGLISH0991 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGLISHG1101 review
G1141 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

25 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 2 · A 10 · A- 4

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1