AI Rate Professor

English

Ryan Sandowicz

ENGLG100 · ENGL099 · ENGL100 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
9/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
4.17%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

unless you specifically want a demanding writing course and and slow feedback.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh gradingHeavy workloadSlow feedbackMany papersPoor communication
  • Most students strongly warn against taking him because and .
  • The class is writing-heavy, with frequent essays, discussions, and large workloads even for intro English.
  • A small minority say he can teach clearly, but only disciplined students who want a challenge seem to benefit.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Students repeatedly say strong and very strict grading.

Online reviews are especially severe about low grades and , while and workload.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The course is intellectually and practically demanding because of , and .

Online sections feel more , while in-person sections can be clearer but still writing-heavy.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Attendance policy is not clearly established, but participation and as important.

Online evidence centers on discussions and deadlines, while and classwork.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students overwhelmingly do not recommend him because of , and poor communication.

Both formats have avoidance warnings, with online reviews showing the strongest and most recent negative pattern.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

as extremely tough, subjective, picky, and capable of turning hard work into low grades.

Format shift

Online reviews report the harshest grading experience, while C grades.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Students frequently report many essays, discussions, readings, and week.

Format shift

Online reviews describe sudden and overlapping assignments, while and lots of classwork.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most reviews , and a discouraging classroom experience.

Format shift

Online reviews are consistently negative, while older in-person reviews include a .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades , and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize essays and writing-heavy assignments, with online sections especially paper-driven.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed historically but recent reviews , and poor communication.

Main concern

The workload is heavy and are clear.

What students said

“ and it doesn't make sense ”
ENGLG100
“His 8 week course is very condensed and requires a lot of but he helps you through it.”
ENGL100
“He is quite strict in grading. Require a lot of in-class writing. Going very fast.”
ENGL099

Remote format

Online

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are overwhelmingly negative, citing harsh essay grading, , and AI-related accusations.

Main concern

Students repeatedly report low grades, unclear expectations, and .

What students said

“IF YOU WANT .”
ENGL100
“He is a . He doesn't give you good grades no matter how hard you tried.”
ENGL100
“ unless you are Shakespeare”
ENGL100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and assessment risk comes mainly from essays and written assignments.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyWriting-Heavy Assessment

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book exams, or a consistent final exam format.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“IF YOU WANT . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

8/100

“ . He is a and bad pm communicating,”

⚖️

8/100

“He doesn't give you good grades no matter how hard you tried.”

📚 Workload Pressure

10/100

“He will create assignments the week of which becomes overwhelming if you have other classes.”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • . Not helpful.
  • .
  • .

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • and it doesn't make sense
  • unless you are Shakespeare
  • Will have you turn in 5 essays week of finals and have them due along with discussions.

Theme 3

📩 About Communication

  • He doesn't answer emails and grades slow.
  • on final two essays
  • he takes about a , but not before assigning you another.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 29 reviews with strong consistency in recent negative experiences across online and in-person formats.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 519

Course coverage

ENGL10014 reviews
ENGLG10012 reviews
ENGL0992 reviews
1001 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

2

A- 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

7

C+ 1 · C 5 · C- 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

4

F 4

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1