AI Rate Professor

English

Keisha Cosand

EDU200 · ENGLG110 · ENG110 · ENGL112 · ENG280 · ENGLISH100 · ENG100110 · ENGLG100 · ENGL280 · G100 · ENGL110 · ENGL281 · ENG100 · ENG099 · ENGLISH110 · 117 lifetime ratings

AI rating
70/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
77.14%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want to improve your writing and can handle steady work, but be .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerGreat feedbackCaring teacherReading and writing heavyTough but fairAI policy concerns
  • Most reviews praise Cosand as caring, engaging, and excellent at helping students improve their writing.
  • The class , and participation, so it is not a low-effort A.
  • Recent ENG110 reviews raise serious concerns about harsh or disorganized AI-related grading, lowering the overall recommendation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

63/100

An A is very achievable for diligent students, but , and revision work.

Online evidence is positive but limited, while and repeated warnings about heavy work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course is intellectually standard to challenging because students , and analyze literature in depth.

Online reviews also mention lots of reading and writing, while and discussions.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as important, with comments warning that missing too many classes can get students dropped or make passing difficult.

, while online reviews do not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

and growth, but recent complaints about AI handling and harsh grading create real caution.

Online reviews are fully positive but few, while recent negatives.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

57/100

as fair with revisions and , but some students call her tough, harsh, or unfair.

Format shift

Online reviews describe progress-based or , while grading and recent harsh-grading complaints.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload is heavy because students repeatedly , and many papers.

Format shift

Online reviews mention lots of reading and writing, while and homework.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

Teaching is strong overall because students , and writing guidance, despite recent negative AI-related experiences.

Format shift

Online reviews are strongly positive, while but include serious recent concerns.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment is centered , and writing revisions rather than traditional tests.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing assignments, with and occasional midterm or .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly strong but show a and heavy workload or harsh grading complaints.

Main concern

and unfairness.

What students said

“Professor assigns too much work, grades harshly and unfairly for non-english majors.”
ENG110
“She has a great selection of readings and a novel, which makes the class interesting.”
ENG100
“She's a , but if you put your time and a lot of effort, you'll easily pass the class.”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are positive and describe her as , and strong for improving reading and writing.

Main concern

Online evidence is limited and still mentions a lot of reading and writing.

What students said

“Professor Cosand is genuinely the best and most motivating English teacher I have ever had!”
ENG110
“There is a lot of reading and writing, so if you are looking and writing, .”
ENGLISH100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because assessment is mostly writing-based, with , and revision opportunities mentioned.

In-Class EssaysTake-Home EssaysOptional Final in Some SectionsNo Quizzes in One SectionRevision Opportunities

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews support writing-based assessments with in-class , and revision opportunities.

In-Class EssaysTake-Home EssaysOptional FinalRevision OpportunitiesNo Tests in Some Sections
“ .”
ENG099
“There are weekly readings (easy) , 3 in class essays (the last one is optional) & 3 major papers.”
ENG100
“9 homework writing assignments, 3 essays, 1 midterm, 1 final in class essay.”
ENG110

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's a , but if you put your time and a lot of effort, you'll easily pass the class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“Ms. Cosand was actually the first prof to REALLY teach me how to write an essay.”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“There is a lot of homework, so don't slack off.”

⚖️

57/100

“She's a , but if you put your time and a lot of effort, you'll easily pass the class.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and always provides support for her students to succeed.
  • so your writing does get a lot stronger.
  • She knows SO much about literature and you walk away from class having learning and thinking more deeply than you thought you were capable of.

Theme 2

✍️ About Workload and Writing

  • and responses (for book reading).
  • There is a lot of reading and writing, so if you are looking and writing, .
  • Lots of homework and papers.

Theme 3

⚠️

  • Professor assigns too much work, grades harshly and unfairly for non-english majors.
  • The professor accused more than half the class of using AI but admitted they can't actually tell who is or isn't.
  • Cosand may be a good teacher, but I would not know as I spent most of my time tiptoeing around her to get the grade I wanted.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

117

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span many years, include rich detail, and show both strong praise and recent critical patterns.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 595
4 out of 511
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 54

Course coverage

ENG10020 reviews
ENG11012 reviews
G1003 reviews
ENG0992 reviews
ENGL1122 reviews
Show 10 more courses
ENGLISH1002 reviews
EDU2001 review
ENG1001101 review
ENG2801 review
ENGL1101 review
ENGL2801 review
ENGL2811 review
ENGLG1001 review
ENGLG1101 review
ENGLISH1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

40 reported outcomes

A range

31

A+ 11 · A 19 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

2

C 2

D range

2

D+ 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values