AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Jennifer Hall

PSYC250 · PSYCH260 · PSYC118 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
71.43%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take her if you can work independently and want a manageable psychology class, but if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProEasy but TediousSlow GraderPoor Email ResponseEngaging AssignmentsLenient Grading
  • Many students find the psychology courses easy or manageable if they complete the readings and assignments.
  • The strongest and weak email communication, especially online.
  • Course enjoyment varies because , but pacing and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Grades are often easy if you complete the readings and assignments, and .

Online evidence shows easy but tedious work, while and .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The content is usually manageable, but readings and .

Online reviews describe more tedious workload, while work manageable.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews do not give enough consistent attendance-policy evidence, and most comments focus .

Neither format clearly proves a strict or .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Students recommend her when they value easy, engaging work, but poor responsiveness and .

, while online reviews are sharply divided because of communication and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Students report , and flexible late-work treatment.

Format shift

and , while in-person reviews explicitly mention late-work leniency.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The work is usually easy but can be tedious, reading-heavy, and .

Format shift

Online reviews contain more workload complaints, especially for intersession or late-start classes.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Her course materials can be engaging, but slow feedback and .

Format shift

In-person students rate the experience better, while online students more often feel unsupported.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews , and group work, so assessment is mixed.

Format shift

Online reviews give the clearest breakdown of , and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

as kind, engaging, and lenient with late work and grading.

Main concern

Even in and .

What students said

“She was very understanding when it came to turning in late work.”
PSYC250
“There is quite a bit of , but it is pretty easy to get done and read through.”
PSYC118

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

students often call the work easy and engaging, but and unanswered emails.

Main concern

Online students may not know their grade for long periods because emails and .

What students said

“She never responded to a , so .”
PSYC250
“The work was easy but tedious.”
PSYC118

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students often call quizzes and exams easy, but reviews do not clearly prove the .

Easy QuizzesEasy ExamsOpen Book and Notes in One In-Person ReviewMidterm and FinalExtra Credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and notes for one PSYC118 section, but does not prove this policy across all in-person classes.

Open Book and NotesEasy QuizzesEasy Exams
“Quizzes and as they are open books and notes.”
PSYC118
“ .”
PSYC118

Online

, and a final, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or proctoring rules for online sections.

QuizzesMidtermFinalExtra Credit
“There is an exam on weeks 2 and 4, and on those weeks, you have an option for .”
PSYC118
“Midterm and !”
PSYC118

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“So overall this class is super easy as long as you do the assignments and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course engagement. Credibility rating: Medium.

📈 Easy A Potential

82/100

“The work was easy but tedious.”

⚠️ Communication Risk

35/100

“She never responded to a , so .”

🎯 Teaching Experience

55/100

“The class material is very engaging and interesting for an online class.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • The work was easy but tedious.
  • ; a , and an activity.
  • There is quite a bit of , but it is pretty easy to get done and read through.

Theme 2

⏳

  • The professor STILL has not graded the MIDTERM and the semester was over a week ago.
  • She grades really slow though and .
  • and grades pretty slowly.

Theme 3

🧠 About Course Experience

  • The class itself was incredibly engaging and I loved the attention to detail in .
  • The layout of this online course is pretty straightforward and done intuitively.
  • She is the best! For an online course the material is still engaging and interesting without being unmanageable.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 21 reviews give useful detail, but opinions differ strongly by format and recent online reviews skew negative.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 57
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PSYC25014 reviews
PSYC1186 reviews
PSYCH2601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 4 · A 8

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 5