AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Natalie Stone

MATH185 · MATH170 · MATH115 · MATHG170 · MATHG115 · MATH180 · MATH100 · 67 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
88.06%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

Take Natalie Stone if you want a and rewards steady effort.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear math explanationsCaring supportExtra creditManageable workloadOrganized online course
  • Students overwhelmingly praise Stone for , and less intimidating.
  • Grades are very attainable, especially with , and .
  • Online sections have more recurring homework and stricter late-work concerns, while and strong teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A is very reachable with , and , though students still need steady effort in test-heavy sections.

Online reviews call it an easy A with , while and exam preparation.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Stone makes math much easier to understand, but calculus and precalculus still require real practice.

Online courses are described as organized and high-school-friendly, while because of but not always easy content.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

70/100

, but participation and class engagement appear helpful rather than harshly enforced.

Online evidence focuses on asynchronous structure, while and asking questions improves results.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and makes math less stressful.

Both formats are highly recommended, with online praise for structure and in-person praise for support and clarity.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Grades are boosted by , optional , and predictable exams.

Format shift

Online grading includes multiple attempts and , while and group quizzes.

Workload

Moderate

64/100

The workload is usually manageable but many , and tests.

Format shift

Online , while in-person sections are often described as minimal or manageable except calculus.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Most students say , and makes difficult topics easier to learn.

Format shift

Online students praise videos and organization, while and patience.

Assessment method

Balanced

64/100

, and occasional group quizzes, with exams important but not the only factor.

Format shift

Online sections rely on Pearson homework, quizzes, and exams, while quizzes.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews emphasize caring teaching, clear calculus , and .

Main concern

A few calculus students felt the pace was too fast and the .

What students said

“You get so .”
MATH185
“Professor barely explains materials especially that Calculus 2 is already a very heavy and hard subject.”
MATH185

Remote format

Online

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online but regular homework, and generally student-friendly exams.

Main concern

Some online students mention lots of homework and strict no-late-work rules.

What students said

“This was an easy A and I actually learned a lot.”
MATH170
“ , and the exams are open-note with no Respondus required.”
MATH100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mostly student-friendly, with open-note or multiple-attempt online exams and and practice.

Open NotesNo Respondus RequiredMultiple AttemptsGroup QuizzesNo Cumulative Final In Some Sections

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe group quizzes, predictable exams, practice exams, and , but .

Group QuizzesPractice ExamsNo Cumulative Final In One SectionTest Heavy
“Graded by 4 tests and 12 .”
MATH185
“ .”
MATH185

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention no proctored software in one course, open-note exams in another, and multiple attempts in several sections.

No Proctored Exam SoftwareOpen NotesNo Respondus RequiredMultiple Attempts
“there is .”
MATH100
“the .”
MATH100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I failed calc 1 once and calc 2 TWICE. On my last and she's the reason I feel confident in math now.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“ so plainly &draws everything !”

👍 Recommendation Level

94/100

“ , and you'll have no regrets!”

📈 Easy A Potential

88/100

“Easy A! Great lectures and always responded to my questions right away.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lecture videos are very thorough and simple, she color-codes the notes and easier to understand.
  • Professor Stone is extremely clear in the way she teaches math.
  • so plainly &draws everything !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Honestly, so long as you do the and EC), you will do fine in this class :D
  • This was an easy A and I actually learned a lot.
  • Grade is based on 4 exam that makes 80% of overall grade and 20% is group quizzes.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Workload Concerns

  • get ready to do a decent amount of homework.
  • she will not accept late work under any circumstances
  • Professor barely explains materials especially that Calculus 2 is already a very heavy and hard subject.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

67

Lifetime ratings

95/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty recent reviews across both formats show consistent praise with , and exam patterns.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 557
4 out of 50
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH10015 reviews
MATH17014 reviews
MATH18514 reviews
MATHG1703 reviews
MATH1802 reviews
Show 2 more courses
MATH1151 review
MATHG1151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

47 reported outcomes

A range

33

A+ 12 · A 20 · A- 1

B range

10

B+ 4 · B 6

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Incomplete 2 · Not sure yet 1