AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Dan Rusu

CS242 · CS130 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you can work independently, meet every deadline, and handle strict or .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderUnclear expectationsLow supportStrict deadlinesConfusing lectures
  • Online reviews , and strict deadlines.
  • reviews and one strongly negative review.
  • Getting an A appears possible only for students who follow rigid expectations and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

A grades are possible, but students , and unclear deductions that make the cost high.

, while the small in-person sample includes older signs of more flexible credit.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students say the content is not always the main issue, but , and poor explanations make the course feel difficult.

Online reviews make the course feel much harder, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though deadlines are described as strict.

Online comments emphasize deadline rigidity, while in-person comments .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students strongly discourage taking him because they feel unsupported and unfairly graded.

, while in-person reviews are mixed but based on only three older comments.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Many students report arbitrary point deductions, zero flexibility, and .

Format shift

and recent, while in-person evidence is mixed.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Projects, reading, recorded lectures, and sudden deadlines make the workload .

Format shift

Online reviews mention lots of homework and rushed project timing; .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students repeatedly describe , weak help, missed office hours, and .

Format shift

, while two older in-person reviews describe him as helpful.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades , and few graded items rather than broad exam evidence.

Format shift

Online and than exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and two older positive comments about help and flexibility.

Main concern

The and inconsistent.

What students said

“When .”
CS130
“ and understanding.”
CS130
“He cares and will work with you if there's an issue, but you do have put in the time.”
CS130

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are highly negative and , and poor support.

Main concern

and help is hard to get.

What students said

“Avoid if you can.”
CS242
“ and inconsistent grading criteria, sometimes marking off huge amounts of .”
CS130
“I hope youre ready for and then due sunday night, same day.”
CS130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy, and the main .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam formatFew graded items

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book, midterm, final, or quiz policies.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format
“Graded by few things”
CS242

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easily the worst professor I've had. , and grades with zero flexibility.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“The class is frustrating, not because of the content, but because of the teaching.”

⚖️

15/100

“ and inconsistent grading criteria, sometimes marking off huge amounts of .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“Avoid if you can.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • egregiously long and .
  • He is a bad prof. , but unfortunately I did not learn anything of value.
  • He cant teach, and goes through it.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • and nonsensicle reasons
  • Grades your code using something similar to turnitin and will constantly accuse you of cheating off of other students in the class
  • When .

Theme 3

📩 About Support

  • Impossible to get ahold of, never showing up for his own posted office hours and rarely responding to emails.
  • does not help you when you ask for it and he will not be specific.
  • He will always be happy to help and will give you credit just for trying.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 12 reviews include recent, detailed, and mostly consistent negative evidence, though .

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 59

Course coverage

CS1309 reviews
CS2423 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 2 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 2