AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Stephen Ruatta

CHEM130 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you want a , but do not assume the chemistry content will be easy without preparation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear lab guidanceHelpfulAccommodatingChemistry background expected
  • Most and helpfulness.
  • Grades look strong, but one older review warns that tests and .
  • Evidence , so confidence is moderate.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Two reported A grades and recent comments suggest a good grade is realistic with lab participation, but .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The lab experience is described as clear and manageable, but chemistry concepts and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews mention accommodation but .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and support, though one older review strongly discourages the class.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person and mixed mostly by review age.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Recent A grades and , though one review calls tests and quizzes very difficult.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Students describe the lab as not too painful, but the older review suggests heavy preparation may be needed for tests and quizzes.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Most comments , and accommodating, while one older review says beginners were not supported enough.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews focus on lab procedures while and and exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

clarity and support, with one older warning about difficult tests and weak alignment.

Main concern

Students without prior chemistry may struggle if lectures and .

What students said

“he was just way clearer than the lecturer professor and was able to guide us really well.”
CHEM130
“made our Chem-185 lab easy to understand and .”
CHEM130
“Tests and and lectures were a week behind the labs”
CHEM130

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention difficult tests and quizzes but do not clearly prove the .

Difficult TestsDifficult Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes but do not clearly prove whether exams are open-book, closed-book, or proctored.

Difficult TestsDifficult Quizzes
“Tests and ”
CHEM130

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I'm very because he was just way clearer than the lecturer professor and was able to guide us really well.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“he was just way clearer than the lecturer professor and was able to guide us really well.”

👍 Recommendation Level

78/100

“ . Ruatta if given the opportunity.”

⚖️ Difficulty Warning

55/100

“Tests and and lectures were a week behind the labs”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he was just way clearer than the lecturer professor and was able to guide us really well.
  • made our Chem-185 lab easy to understand and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • overall, he made that .
  • Tests and and lectures were a week behind the labs

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

, but they include recent detailed comments and a clear older dissenting view.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CHEM1303 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values