AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Isaac Elgindi

MATHG120 · MATH160 · MATHG140 · STATS180 · G030 · G160 · MATHG100 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
41.18%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if , and tolerate inconsistent communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized pacingHeavy homeworkSlow email responseExtra credit opportunitiesConfusing lectures
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, but and poor organization.
  • and last-minute scheduling are the biggest recurring complaints.
  • Some in-person students report and fair chances to pass when they keep up.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

An A is possible with homework and , but many , and strict pacing.

Online evidence is mostly harder and less supported, while and passable grading.

Is the course easy?

Standard

43/100

The math content is not always the core problem, but and .

Online students , while in-person students had more direct help but still reported confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Several in-person reviews warn that skipping class hurts performance, and participation or .

, while online reviews focus more on deadlines and communication.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Most negative reviews warn against taking him because of , and poor organization.

Online reviews are strongly negative, while and workable with effort.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Grading is not consistently harsh, and helps, but homework and .

Format shift

, while online reviews provide less evidence of .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and .

Format shift

Online complaints include especially compressed deadlines, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some students praise his care, but many describe , weak organization, and poor email response.

Format shift

Online teaching is described more negatively, while and serious criticism.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and exams, so assessment appears mixed rather than exam-only.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments and sudden exams, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with some students praising and help while .

Main concern

Students need to keep up with , and lectures despite inconsistent organization.

What students said

“Gave tons of and always there to help you!”
MATH160
“changes dates and , and skips back and forth between chapters.”
G160

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with , and rushed deadlines.

Main concern

Online students often had to rely on outside resources and handle sudden due dates.

What students said

“I had to use you tube for the entire lessons.”
MATH160
“ and gave until the next day to finish them.”
MATH160

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

easy or note-supported tests and others citing sudden exams and pop quizzes.

Last-Minute ExamsPop QuizzesEasy Exams In Some CoursesNotes Allowed On Weekly Online Quizzes

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and one note-supported quiz format, but do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy.

Pop QuizzesTest HeavyNotes Allowed On Weekly Online Quizzes
“ . Pop Quizzes and .”
MATHG140
“ but you're allowed to use notes n stuff.”
G030

Online

, but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Last-Minute Exams
“ and gave until the next day to finish them.”
MATH160

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you put in effort and time then this class is an Easy A. You get what you give.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“I've never had a less engaging or .”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“It just was absurd the whole class.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

35/100

“DO NOT TAKEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He gives high-quality lectures, and he's not a .
  • Difficult to understand, makes work more complicated than it needs be
  • Professor

Theme 2

📈 About Grades And Work

  • Gave tons of and always there to help you!
  • If you put in effort and time then this class is an Easy A.
  • The and took hours each day.

Theme 3

⏰ About Organization

  • and gave until the next day to finish them.
  • He takes absolute ages to respond to student emails, even urgent ones.
  • changes dates and , and skips back and forth between chapters.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across multiple years and formats show recurring themes of , and .

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 57

Course coverage

MATH1606 reviews
G1603 reviews
MATHG1403 reviews
MATHG1202 reviews
G0301 review
Show 2 more courses
MATHG1001 review
STATS1801 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 4 · A- 2

B range

5

B+ 2 · B 3

C range

2

C 2

D range

2

D 2

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values