AI Rate Professor

Automotive Technology

David Perez

AUTO101 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

if you want a and cares about student success.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear explanationsCaring instructorIndustry experienceHelpful feedbackGreat energy
  • All reviews praise him as , and .
  • Students say he simplifies automotive material and supports both lecture and lab learning.
  • Evidence is very positive but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students report low difficulty and strong support, but grades vary, so the A .

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

Students say he breaks material down simply and provides resources that make the course approachable.

All course easiness evidence comes from in-person AUTO101 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews mention participation but do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they do not clearly establish an .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Every review recommends him or strongly praises his teaching, help, communication, and care.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

Low difficulty ratings and , but reviews do not give enough detail to call it generous.

Format shift

, and it is indirect rather than policy-specific.

Workload

Light

78/100

Reviews describe the course as low difficulty and manageable, with no repeated complaints about heavy workload.

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from in-person AUTO101 reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

98/100

Students consistently describe him as , and highly recommended.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in-person, with no online reviews available.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and resources but do not clearly describe exams as the main assessment method.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and assessment details are limited.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are uniformly positive, emphasizing clear explanations, feedback, industry experience, humor, and care.

Main concern

The only concern is limited evidence because there are just four reviews.

What students said

“very good, breaks down everything in a simplified way”
AUTO101
“Mr. Perez is awesome.”
AUTO101
“Overall, one of the .”
AUTO101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, final, open-book, or proctoring policies.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Overall, one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity, support, and automotive experience; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

98/100

“very good, breaks down everything in a simplified way”

❤️ Student Support

98/100

“When you ask for help Mr. Perez is WILL help you out.”

👍 Recommendation Level

98/100

“I would totally recommend to anyone who has him for a class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • very good, breaks down everything in a simplified way
  • great energy and has excellent communication

Theme 2

❤️ About Support

  • When you ask for help Mr. Perez is WILL help you out.
  • he really cares about everyone in the class

Theme 3

🔧 About Automotive Value

  • He gives you a lot of resources to help you with ASE certification.
  • He's got tons of industry experience

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because all four reviews are recent and consistent but the sample size is small and lacks assessment detail.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

AUTO1014 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1