AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Tien Truong

MATH160 · MATH140 · MATHG115 · G115 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can learn math mostly on your own and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast-paced lecturesPoor explanationsHard testsLots of homeworkLenient homework drops
  • Most students complain that lectures move too fast and .
  • as extremely difficult, especially with no study guides.
  • A few students say he is caring and grade-friendly if you work hard, but the overall experience is risky.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students report easy grading and dropped assignments, but hard tests and .

because there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

26/100

The math content feels much harder because lectures are fast, examples are limited, and .

because there are zero online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

because missing class hurts learning, but lectures often do not add enough clarity.

because there are zero online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

29/100

Most students do not recommend him because unclear teaching and .

because there are zero online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Homework and quizzes can be forgiving, but as very difficult.

Format shift

because there are zero online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and difficult test preparation.

Format shift

All because there are zero online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Most reviews say , and leaves students learning from the textbook.

Format shift

All because there are zero online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Homework and quizzes matter, but the strongest risk in .

Format shift

All because there are zero online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and heavy homework, with a few positive comments about easy grading and caring support.

Main concern

The main while .

What students said

“Moves through material too fast.”
MATH140
“He's such an if you don't do the work.”
MATHG115

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students repeatedly describe very difficult tests and no study guides.

Difficult TestsNo Study GuidesTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

24/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and no study guides, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or .

Difficult TestsNo Study GuidesTest Heavy
“ . Won't even give a study guide.”
MATH140
“The !”
MATH140

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Moves through material too fast. Homework and . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“he primarily reads directly from textbook without teaching or explaining the material clearly.”

⚠️

24/100

“The !”

⚖️

55/100

“allows his students and quiz.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Moves through material too fast.
  • He doesn't teach!

Theme 2

🧪 About Tests

  • .
  • Won't even give a study guide.
  • The !

Theme 3

📚 About Workload And Grades

  • Although there was a lot of .
  • He's such an if you don't do the work.
  • Even when studying and working on my homework ahead of time, getting help from tutors. I didn't pass

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eight in-person reviews over several years give consistent negative evidence, but the sample is small and includes a few sharply positive outliers.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATHG1154 reviews
MATH1402 reviews
G1151 review
MATH1601 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1