AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Smith Neal

ACCT · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take him if you want a and and serious exam preparation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaringHomework HeavyExtra CreditTest Heavy
  • Students describe him as kind and helpful, but the workload is a .
  • Online reviews mention and fair support, but also proctored tests and .
  • and frustration with heavy McGraw Hill homework.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible with and steady work, but homework and .

Online evidence shows and , while in-person evidence highlights heavier homework frustration.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The accounting material is manageable when students follow lectures and readings, but homework and .

Online reviews call homework doable with lecture and reading, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a .

Neither online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

because he is kind and helpful, though workload complaints lower confidence.

Online reviews are more consistently positive, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

and fair support help grades, but .

Format shift

Online reviews mention , while in-person reviews .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

, and test preparation.

Format shift

Both formats mention workload, but the strongest complaint comes from an .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

He is described as caring and helpful, but some students struggle with course structure and workload.

Format shift

, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

, and tests, with no single assessment type fully dominating.

Format shift

Online reviews mention proctored tests and homework, while and fear of tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are polarized, with one student praising his care and .

Main concern

and excessive.

What students said

“Professor Neal cares about his students and if you have questions.”
ACCT
“If you want to get flamed with ”
ACCT

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students report fair , and clearly proctored tests.

Main concern

and are proctored.

What students said

“Professor is very kind, fair, and willing to work with students! .”
ACCT
“The .”
ACCT

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, but online and the need to focus to pass.

Online Proctored TestsTest HeavyExam Focus Needed

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, though one student expected tests to be difficult.

Test Concern
“I am scared of the tests if .”
ACCT

Online

Online reviews explicitly state that tests are proctored and require focused study.

Online Proctored TestsExam Focus Needed
“The .”
ACCT
“The in order to pass”
ACCT

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Neal cares about his students and if you have questions.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Professor Neal cares about his students and if you have questions.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“If you want to get flamed with ”

🧪

45/100

“The .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Neal cares about his students and if you have questions.
  • Professor is very kind, fair, and willing to work with students! .

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • as long you follow the lecture and do the reading assignments.
  • If you want to get flamed with

Theme 3

🧪 About Tests

  • The in order to pass
  • The .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only but mixed and limited evidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ACCT4 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1