AI Rate Professor

English

Cecelia Galassi

ENGLISH98 · ENG110 · ENGL098 · ENG100H · ENGLG100 · ENGLISH090 · ENG99 · ENG098 · ENGLISH099 · G098 · ENG100 · ENG099 · G100 · 99 lifetime ratings

AI rating
49/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
54.29%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take her if you want serious writing growth and can handle harsh grading, but if .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy WritingDelayed FeedbackCaring When SupportiveStrong Writing Preparation
  • Students consistently describe her as a .
  • Many positive reviews and improves writing skills.
  • Recent online and ENG100 or ENG110 reviews report slow grading, harsh comments, and heavy paper workloads.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A is possible, but students describe strict essay grading, heavy revision expectations, and frequent need to argue or work hard for points.

Online evidence is harsher about delayed grades, while but .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course content is writing-heavy and manageable for motivated students, but many reviews call the workload hard and feedback-dependent.

Online reviews make the course feel more stressful, while writing skill.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Several in-person reviews say attendance is important or required, while online reviews emphasize participation and deadlines rather than flexibility.

limited online attendance policy detail.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Students recommend her for serious writing improvement, but many warn against her because of , and tone issues.

long term, while recent online reviews are more polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Grading is repeatedly described as tough, detail-focused, and .

Format shift

Both formats report tough grading, with online reviews especially frustrated by late grades.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Students , and a workload that requires steady effort.

Format shift

Online accelerated courses sound especially busy, while and reading.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Many students praise her care and writing instruction, but recent negative reviews describe poor support, rude comments, and .

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is broader and more positive, while online reviews are more uneven.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Grades , and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize papers and writing assignments over tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a long record of strong teaching and caring help, but also and lots of writing.

Main concern

, and detailed writing standards.

What students said

“This class severely improved my writing skills, and she guided me through the whole process.”
G100
“She doesn't help, and will tell you to get help from tutors instead.”
ENG100
“She is very thorough grader & will read each & every word that is written to ensure you get the .”
ENG110

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are sharply mixed, with strong praise for support but , and heavy papers.

Main concern

Online students most and difficult essays.

What students said

“Will nor grade your work for months.”
110
“No tests but I did find her class topics to be a bit politically biased sometimes.”
ENG110
“Take her class!!!”
110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest the course is mostly paper-based, and one online review explicitly says there were no tests.

No TestsPaper-Based Assessment

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, midterms, or finals.

Essay-Based Grading
“She is very thorough grader & will read each & every word that is written to ensure you get the .”
ENG110
“There r 7 essays (can only fail 3 papers), 3 quizzes from the book (very easy), and the grammar packet is your homework that you need to turn it in on the due date.”
ENG098

Online

Online evidence mentions papers and one review explicitly says there were no tests, but reviews do not clearly .

No TestsPapers
“No tests but I did find her class topics to be a bit politically biased sometimes.”
ENG110
“2 essays make up most of your grade.”
110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Recommend if you care about improving your writing and critical thinking skills.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“This class severely improved my writing skills, and she guided me through the whole process.”

⚖️

25/100

“She grades VERY harshly, no room for error.”

📝 Workload

30/100

“Get ready to write lots and lots of as well so .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has helped me for hours after class time.
  • She explained stuff many times and extend due date in order to give students .
  • She doesn't help, and will tell you to get help from tutors instead.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is a but .
  • .
  • Must argue with her to get grades improved.

Theme 3

📝

  • She gives so but takes 3 months to grade them so you have no feed back about what to change.
  • A lot of readings but you will learn a lot.
  • SHE TOOK MONTHS TO GRADE and by then it was too late to know on what and how to improve on things to better next time.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

99

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The dataset has 50 reviews across many years and formats, with , and workload.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 560
4 out of 59
3 out of 57
2 out of 54
1 out of 519

Course coverage

ENG11011 reviews
ENG0988 reviews
ENG0996 reviews
ENG1005 reviews
ENGLISH0905 reviews
Show 11 more courses
1104 reviews
G1002 reviews
0981 review
584021 review
ENG100H1 review
ENG991 review
ENGL0981 review
ENGLG1001 review
ENGLISH0991 review
ENGLISH981 review
G0981 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

34 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 6 · A 11

B range

9

B+ 3 · B 4 · B- 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

5

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1