AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Farrid Zeighami

CS130 · 23 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

if you can stay organized and work independently, but if you need steady communication and guidance.

Best fit · Self Taught ProGPA boosterExtra creditSelf-paced workPoor communication riskCengage/SAM dependent
  • The class is repeatedly described as very easy and a strong GPA booster, with many A grades and opportunities.
  • Teaching experience is polarized because many students find him helpful while others call him unavailable, rude, or unclear.
  • Online reviews especially suggest students may need to manage SAM/Cengage deadlines and learn independently.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

93/100

The because reviews repeatedly mention easy work, GPA boosting, and large opportunities.

Both formats support an easy A, but online students must track SAM/Cengage work carefully.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

88/100

The course content is basic computer applications work and is often described as extremely easy.

Online reviews frame the work as self-paced software tasks, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

The really mandatory and lab attendance is not necessary.

Attendance flexibility is supported by in-person evidence, while online reviews do not provide a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

74/100

, but communication and professionalism complaints keep the recommendation from being universal.

Online reviews are mostly positive but include self-management warnings, while helpfulness.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

91/100

is repeatedly described as abundant and powerful enough to make the .

Format shift

Both formats mention , with in-person reviews especially blunt about easy A outcomes.

Workload

Light

78/100

Most reviews call the work easy, though online students mention .

Format shift

Online workload is more structured through weekly SAM/Cengage tasks, while and .

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

The course outcomes are strong, but teaching support is inconsistent because some students praise him while others report poor communication and rudeness.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews include stronger complaints about being unapproachable.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Grades appear driven , and , with exams present but less central.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize SAM/Cengage homework and quizzes, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

, but negative reviews highlight rude communication and lack of availability.

Main concern

Some students report he is unapproachable or .

What students said

“it's like an easiest A class i ever taken.”
CS130
“The teacher was completely unavailable most of the time.”
CS130

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews mostly call the course easy and good for GPA, but several warn that , and self-management can be frustrating.

Main concern

Students may feel on their own because the class relies heavily on SAM/Cengage and .

What students said

“Easy GPA booster class.”
CS130
“youre literally on your own in this class.”
CS130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear low-risk because they are described as mostly multiple choice and , but proctoring rules are not clearly proven.

Multiple-Choice ExamsFinal ExceptionExtra Credit Reduces Exam PressureNo Clear Proctoring Proof

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not clearly describe exam format or proctoring, but is said to make the .

Extra Credit Reduces Final PressureNo Clear Exam Format Proof
“the , and makes the final irrelevant.”
CS130

Online

Online reviews mention mostly multiple-choice exams and a , but do not clearly prove open-book, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring rules.

Multiple-Choice ExamsFinal ExceptionNo Clear Proctoring Proof
“ ”
CS130

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Amazing class to boost your GPA.”

Voice snapshots generated from 23 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

📈 Easy A Path

93/100

“he is so easy. there are a lot of . it is easy to get an A or B.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Does not communicate with students. .”

⚖️

91/100

“there are A LOT of opportunities.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy class to boost your GPA
  • it's like an easiest A class i ever taken.
  • Amazing class to boost your GPA.

Theme 2

🧑‍💻 About Independent Work

  • Everything was online through SAM Cengage
  • you will be on your own
  • so its .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Communication

  • The teacher was completely unavailable most of the time.
  • .
  • He was extremely rude and completely lacked any sense of professionalism.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

23

Recent reviews read by the AI

23

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-three reviews across both formats provide enough detail and reveal a and uneven professor support.

Inside 23 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CS13023 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 4 · A 10 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values