AI Rate Professor

Biology

Luis Rosa

BIO180L · BIOLG225 · BIO1005103 · BIO220 · G220L · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
72.73%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you will study consistently, but be cautious with online sections because organization has varied.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring Lab InstructorClear Practical PrepAnatomy Is DemandingMixed Online Organization
  • and repeatedly describe Rosa as , and helpful.
  • Anatomy content is inherently hard, but students say his guidance and study materials make it manageable.
  • Online reviews are split, with praise for videos and study guides but serious complaints about organization during remote terms.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

A strong grade is realistic with and use of practice materials, but anatomy still requires consistent memorization.

, while online evidence is less reliable because organization problems made performance harder.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The professor makes material clearer, but anatomy and and memory-heavy.

Both formats describe anatomy as hard, but understand.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

as formally strict, but and being present are important for passing.

In-person lab reviews stress attending class, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students recommend him because , and helpful, though online organization issues lower confidence.

In-person reviews are highly recommendatory, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

63/100

Students describe his grading as fair with as an easy free pass.

Format shift

, while online reviews focus more on organization than grading leniency.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload is manageable but study-heavy because , and .

Format shift

Online reviews mention long practice quizzes and , while .

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

He is repeatedly praised as caring, approachable, and clear, with online organization complaints preventing an excellent overall score.

Format shift

In-person teaching experience is excellent, while online delivery was inconsistent during remote sections.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and tests more than large projects or papers.

Format shift

Both formats mention test preparation, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are very positive, , and clear help with difficult anatomy material.

Main concern

Students still need to study constantly because anatomy is content-heavy.

What students said

“He is fair with and and cares about his students .”
BIO220
“The community of students were tightly knit and the learning was orchestrated in a way where it was a stress-free, engaging environment.”
G220L
“However, since this is anatomy, be prepared to study constantly.”
BIO220

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are polarized, with one strong praise for videos and handouts and and poor organization.

Main concern

Online course organization and responsiveness were inconsistent.

What students said

“I learned everything from Luis's videos & the study guide handouts he gives are an amazing resource.”
G220L
“ because his own is wrong and students had to tell HIM the correct answers instead of the other way around.”
BIOLG225
“Canvas scores are messy, quiz scores deleted, and .”
BIO220

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show a , but they do not clearly prove open-book rules or strict proctoring.

Lab ExamsLab PracticalsPractice QuizzesTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and fair lab practicals, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or strict proctoring.

Lab ExamsLab Practicals
“class is , and .”
BIO220
“He is very fair with and admits to any mistakes he makes.”
G220L

Online

Online reviews mention tests and long practice quizzes, but do not clearly .

TestsPractice Quizzes
“He prepares you fully for the .”
G220L

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He cares so much about his students and does everything to help you succeed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“He cares so much about his students and does everything to help you succeed.”

📚 Course Challenge

45/100

“However, since this is anatomy, be prepared to study constantly.”

⚠️ Online Organization

55/100

“Canvas scores are messy, quiz scores deleted, and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is caring of students and is always willing to answer any questions or stay after class for those who need extra help.
  • Amazing and vibrant professor, who really wants you to grasp the understanding and makes it vividly easy to comprehend.
  • . Engaged with students, and very helpful.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Anatomy is a hard class in general with the amount of knowledge that is needed to retain.
  • He is fair with and and cares about his students .
  • However, since this is anatomy, be prepared to study constantly.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Sections

  • I learned everything from Luis's videos & the study guide handouts he gives are an amazing resource.
  • , study guide does not help, stressful labster assignments.
  • Luis seems to be a really good professor in person.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across and enough online detail to identify the format split.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BIO2205 reviews
BIOLG2252 reviews
G220L2 reviews
BIO10051031 review
BIO180L1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 3 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1