AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Avery Caldwell

DARTG150 · G135 · DART152 · G170 · DART170 · DART150 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
21.43%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Only take Avery Caldwell if you can teach yourself and want a potentially easy grade despite weak structure and support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsiveUnclear AssignmentsOutdated MaterialsEasy ADisorganized
  • Many students criticize poor , and outdated tutorials.
  • The class can still be an easy A because grading and expectations often appear loose.
  • , while online reviews are strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

An A is often easy because students report and many A grades, but and frustration.

Online students often earn high grades despite poor support, while and some project effort.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The content is not described as intellectually hard, but and outdated materials make the class harder to navigate.

Online difficulty comes mostly from poor structure and self-teaching, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

74/100

, while other reviews mention participation and presentations, so flexibility varies.

, while in-person reviews range from not needing to show up to participation-heavy projects.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students do not recommend him because they , and little teaching.

, while in-person reviews are split between strong praise and serious complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grades appear lenient because many students earned A grades even while criticizing poor instruction and low accountability.

Format shift

Online reviews show high grades despite complaints, while get an A.

Workload

Moderate

63/100

The workload seems manageable, but , and delayed feedback make the effort feel inefficient.

Format shift

Online workload is worsened by unclear instructions, while , and book exercises.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Teaching quality is poor overall because students repeatedly report disorganization, unresponsiveness, outdated materials, and weak instruction.

Format shift

Online teaching is consistently criticized, while strong positive reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment , and assignments rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus on assignments and projects, and reviews .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and learning but others reporting unclear instruction, lateness, and low accountability.

Main concern

Instruction quality and class organization vary widely by term.

What students said

“I LEARNED SO MUCH!”
DART150
“He's either late every class or doesn't bother to show up at all.”
G170

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are strongly negative, citing unresponsive communication, unclear , and little learning.

Main concern

Students may have to learn the software largely on their own.

What students said

“ , and he used tutorials from five years ago”
DART170
“ because I didn't learn anything”
DART170

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam policy, and the course appears .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyAssignment-Based Course

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring policies, and evidence focuses on assignments and projects.

ProjectsPresentationsBook Exercises
“ ”
DARTG150
“We did have to do book exercises on our own”
DARTG150

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and he used tutorials from five years ago which isn't useful when Adobe constantly changes their programs.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“This professor has been nothing but a scatterbrained nuisance!”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ because I didn't learn anything”

⚖️

78/100

“Do all of the work, you will get an A, don't have to show up.”

Theme 1

📬 About Communication

  • Very unresponsive to emails.
  • . .

Theme 2

🧭 About Structure & Materials

  • There is little to no structure in this class
  • .
  • Expected student to use latest software but his demonstration video was four years old.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades & Effort

  • Do all of the work, you will get an A, don't have to show up.
  • He also doesn't check your discussion answers-just how many you post.
  • If you want to go home early enroll in his class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 15 reviews span many years and the negative online pattern is consistent, though .

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 510

Course coverage

DART1504 reviews
DART1704 reviews
G1353 reviews
DARTG1502 reviews
DART1521 review
Show 1 more courses
G1701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 5 · A 5

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1