AI Rate Professor

Computer Science

Sara Ghadami

CSG131 · G175 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
63/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
62.5%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

She is a solid choice for organized students, but if you need flexible deadlines or low-cost materials.

Best fit · Effort For RewardOrganized CanvasClear InstructionsLots of HomeworkCostly MaterialsMixed Online Support
  • Students strongly praise her organization, clarity, and care in several reviews.
  • Negative online reviews focus on costly materials, heavy zyBooks work, strict late policy, and .
  • The course is manageable for students who practice programming consistently and stay on schedule.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Grades are achievable with , and practice, but strict deadlines and heavy work can quickly damage the grade.

Online reviews show more effort and deadline risk, while the and more supportive.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Students say the course is not inherently hard, but programming topics still require consistent practice and .

Online students mention more self-teaching and materials burden, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

Reviews do not clearly prove an , but deadlines and late work appear strict.

, so the main flexibility concern comes from online late-policy comments.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and clarity, but online complaints make the recommendation conditional.

, while online reviews are split between high praise and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

on time, but the late policy can be unforgiving.

Format shift

Online reviews provide the strict grading concerns, while .

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Multiple online reviews mention lots of , and test-heavy structure.

Format shift

Heavy workload evidence is mainly online, while the fully.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Her best reviews describe clear instructions, organized Canvas pages, responsiveness, and engaging teaching, though some online students report minimal lectures and poor email support.

Format shift

, while online feedback is polarized.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

The course uses weekly assignments along with quizzes, tests, midterms, and finals.

Format shift

Online reviews provide most assessment details, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are , and high recommendation.

Main concern

, so the evidence is positive but limited.

What students said

“Clear explanations & planning 10/10.”
CS-G131
“ ! I 100% recommend her”
G175

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with strong praise for organization and clarity but , and limited help.

Main concern

The biggest , and strict deadlines.

What students said

“Professor Ghadami is responsive and .”
CS-G131
“Do not take this Professor's Java 2 class, all they do is assign zybook online reading assignments and a minimal amount of .”
CS-G131
“no tolerance late policy dropped me to a C and i could never recover.”
G175

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

midterm and final exams, including at least one proctored final.

Midterm ExamFinal ExamProctored FinalMultiple Choice ExamsTests

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or proctoring policy.

Online

, and one proctored final, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Proctored FinalMidterm ExamFinal ExamQuizzes
“The so be prepared and study and practice programming.”
CS-G131
“there are midterm and ”
CS-G131

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Ghadami is responsive and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, cost, and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She is an exceptional educator who clearly cares about students and is deeply passionate about the subject matter.”

📚 Workload Pressure

35/100

“ and tests.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

68/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Clear explanations & planning 10/10.
  • She made the material come alive in a way that was engaging and thought-provoking.
  • Do not take this Professor's Java 2 class, all they do is assign zybook online reading assignments and a minimal amount of .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • The course is not hard but the main issue is that she teaches from 3 materials which totals to be around $200+.
  • no tolerance late policy dropped me to a C and i could never recover.
  • Like other programming classes, you need to be prepared to practice and study on your own.

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams And Assignments

  • The so be prepared and study and practice programming.
  • there are midterm and
  • and tests.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 8 reviews, mostly online and fairly recent, but the sample is small and split in tone.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CS-G1316 reviews
G1752 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values