AI Rate Professor

Management

Stephanie Ferrara

MGMTG115 · MGMT115 · MGMTG111 · MANAGEMENT115 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can handle independent writing-heavy work and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed ExperienceUnclear FeedbackOnline FriendlyWriting HeavyCommunication Issues
  • Student experiences and serious complaints about feedback and responsiveness.
  • Online reviews are mostly easier but still and unclear writing expectations.
  • In-person reviews conflict strongly, ranging from excellent support to a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

Some students earned A grades with simple work, but and grade cuts make the A feel inconsistent.

Online reviews lean easier, while and harsh grading complaints.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The material is often described as simple and common sense, but writing expectations can make the course harder than the content itself.

Online reviews more clearly describe easy content, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

72/100

Online classes appear flexible with , while .

Online evidence supports flexibility, but policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Recommendation is split because some students find her caring and clear while and nonresponse.

Online and and negatives, but online reviews provide more detail.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

writing and citation expectations.

Format shift

Online reviews mention citation and writing grading issues, while .

Workload

Moderate

63/100

Work can be simple and minimal for some students, but discussions and .

Format shift

Online reviews describe simple work with discussions and writing, while .

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Teaching quality is inconsistent, with strong praise for support and responsiveness.

Format shift

, and in-person reviews are sharply divided.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Assessments appear assignment and writing based, with explicit evidence of .

Format shift

Online reviews clearly mention discussions, writing, presentations, and no tests, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly polarized, with one student strongly recommending her and .

Main concern

Grading and instructional value may feel inconsistent depending on the class experience.

What students said

“ .”
MGMT115
“She does no work and does not add any value. AVOID!”
MGMTG111

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe simple coursework and minimal demands, but , and .

Main concern

Students and limited instructor response.

What students said

“A great class, completely online and !”
MGMT115
“Does not return emails if you have an issue.”
MANAGEMENT115

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews explicitly mention all writing and no tests, so exam risk appears low, but .

No TestsWriting AssignmentsPresentationsDiscussions

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book rules, or final exam policy.

Online

Online evidence says the class uses writing, discussions, and presentations rather than tests, but .

No TestsWriting AssignmentsDiscussionsPresentations
“ .”
MANAGEMENT115
“There were a couple of presentations but she made them easy.”
MGMT115

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“Dr.S taught in a way that made me feel like it was okay to ask questions and learn from my mistakes.”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“She does no work and does not add any value. AVOID!”

⚖️

35/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 Teaching & Support

  • She seemed to really care about the students.
  • Does not return emails if you have an issue.
  • Non responsive to questions and .

Theme 2

📄 Work & Assessment

  • The classwork is very simple and not difficult but it also is a lot of common sense.
  • .
  • There were a couple of presentations but she made them easy.

Theme 3

⚖️

  • The comments she gives with the grades are exactly the same each time and .
  • Grades down if you dont cite resources in .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because six reviews cover both formats with detailed but conflicting experiences.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MGMT1153 reviews
MANAGEMENT1151 review
MGMTG1111 review
MGMTG1151 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1