AI Rate Professor

Art

Carrie Ohm

ARTG122 · ARTG121 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a and makes the class enjoyable.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyCaring mentorStrong feedbackInspirationalCeramics favorite
  • Students consistently describe Carrie Ohm as caring, motivating, and approachable.
  • Grades look very favorable, with reported A+ outcomes and low difficulty ratings.
  • Attendance and studio time matter because .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Reported grades are very high and difficulty is low, but .

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The course feels approachable because the professor is motivating, though .

, and they describe ceramics as fun with a supportive instructor.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as formally mandatory, but participation and studio time appear important.

Only in-person reviews mention class participation and project time.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students strongly recommend her because , and .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

The + and students report low difficulty with .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload is manageable, but students warn that .

Format shift

In-person reviews are the only source and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

99/100

Students repeatedly praise her kindness, inspiration, and feedback.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Reviews focus on ceramics projects and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews are available and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are , and motivation in ceramics.

Main concern

Students should use class and .

What students said

“ .”
ARTG121
“use your time wisely, you'll wish that you had more .”
ARTG122
“ and cares about her students.”
ARTG121

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book rules, or final formats.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, and project workload; credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

99/100

“ and many students continue in her Ceramics courses.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“IF you are looking to take ceramics I would advice taking it with Carrie.”

📌 Workload Reality

62/100

“use your time wisely, you'll wish that you had more .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and many students continue in her Ceramics courses.
  • and cares about her students.
  • Carrie is so caring and inspirational when I was taking her class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I am coming back for the advanced class and I excited!
  • use your time wisely, you'll wish that you had more .

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She treats you like a friend and not as a student/peer.
  • I love her she's the !
  • I was so lucky to have Carrie!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are consistent and include specific comments about teaching and project time.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARTG1212 reviews
ARTG1221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values