AI Rate Professor

English

Jennifer Gianunzio

ENGG100 · ENG110 · ENGLISH099 · ENG100 · ENGLISH110 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
33/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
22.22%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want strict writing training and , and long lectures.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderHeavy essaysLong lecturesMixed feedbackStrict classroom
  • Reviews are sharply polarized, with some students praising her help and others warning strongly against taking her.
  • The dominant , and long or boring lectures.
  • Students who want strict writing feedback may improve, but students seeking an easy or .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible for some students, but as strict and grade-dominant.

Both online and in-person comments adding more warnings about tough grading.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

The course is intellectually manageable for some, but fast pacing, long lectures, and .

Online reviews stress repetitive work and essay weight, while and lecture fatigue.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

and class behavior matter, while online reviews do not show flexibility.

In-person evidence mentions skipping class and strict classroom expectations, while online evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

The recommendation level is low because many students describe the class as stressful, boring, strict, and overly hard to grade well in.

Online reviews are negative, and in-person reviews are polarized but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

, and several students say homework points do not offset low essay scores.

Format shift

Both formats describe essay-heavy grading, with .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and overlapping due dates.

Format shift

Online reviews describe repetitive homework and essay weight, while and unmanageable workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Some students say she is helpful and improves writing, but many describe lectures as boring, unhelpful, or poorly used.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is mostly negative, while and strong criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Grades are described as , and writing assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both online and and papers as the main assessment method.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but mostly warn about tough grading, long lectures, strict behavior rules, and many papers.

Main concern

and lecture-heavy classes create a high-friction experience.

What students said

“She is a .”
ENG100
“Workload is almost unmanageable”
ENGLISH099
“ and she is a .”
ENGLISH099

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are negative, , and low motivation.

Main concern

while and unrewarding.

What students said

“ on your essays/papers.”
ENGG100
“Lectures are pointless and extremely boring.”
ENG110
“Grades are mainly based on the essays.”
ENG110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays and homework, and they do not clearly prove exam .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policyEssay-based grading

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not clearly prove exam format, but .

Exam policy unclearEssay-based grading
“ and she is a .”
ENGLISH099
“ , and let's you re-write some of the essays”
ENGLISH099

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, quiz, midterm, or .

Exam policy unclearEssay-based grading
“ on your essays/papers.”
ENGG100
“Grades are mainly based on the essays.”
ENG110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and would advise any friends or family to not have her as a professor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and classroom fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Very poor teaching skills. Does not make good use of her time in class.”

⚖️

22/100

“She is a .”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“Workload is almost unmanageable”

Theme 1

⚖️ and Grades

  • on your essays/papers.
  • and she is a .
  • Be prepared to work for your grade and visit the tutoring center after class for any necessary help.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are pointless and extremely boring.
  • Does not make good use of her time and is very boring.
  • She is very willing to help with any questions you might have

Theme 3

📚 About Workload and Essays

  • Gives an abundant amount of long, repetitive and .
  • bundles large assignments and .
  • .

Theme 4

🚦 About Classroom Fit

  • Skip class? You won't pass.
  • She doesn't allow food or drinks in class unless its bottled water and doesn't allow phones either.
  • You will be fine as long you do your work like she ask you to

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two reviews across many years provide , and classroom strictness.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 59

Course coverage

ENG1009 reviews
ENGLISH0997 reviews
ENG1102 reviews
ENGG1002 reviews
0991 review
Show 1 more courses
ENGLISH1101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 1