AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Ervin Slavick

ECON175 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take Slavick only if you can tolerate unclear quiz wording and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnfair QuizzesBad FeedbackGrammar IssuesSomewhat HelpfulReading Required
  • All reviews are online and focus on Econ175, with two of three describing unfair wording and .
  • One student found Slavick helpful and easy to communicate with, but the negative comments are more specific and repeated.
  • Grades were not disastrous, but assignment and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Students earned decent grades, but and A feel unreliable.

All evidence comes from online reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Macroeconomics concepts were not described as impossible, but and .

Only online Econ175 reviews are available.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

60/100

Reviews do not clearly describe attendance rules or required live participation.

Only online reviews exist, and they do not prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Two of three , and fairness, outweighing one positive communication review.

All recommendation evidence is from online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Grades include A, B, and B+, but comments suggest quiz and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The workload does not sound overwhelming, but , and .

Format shift

All workload evidence comes from online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

One student found him helpful, but repeated complaints about grammar and .

Format shift

Only online teaching evidence exists.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention assignments, homework, and .

Format shift

Online reviews provide all assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are , and unfair quiz or assignment wording, despite one review praising his helpfulness.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“ and all concerns and questions I had”
Econ175
“some of the .”
Econ175
“Bad grammar and .”
Econ175

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes but do not clearly prove exam .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam PolicyQuizzes Mentioned

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes and unfair wording but do not clearly .

Quizzes MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“Bad grammar and .”
Econ175
“Gave a , but had an unmentioned 3 part fill in the blank question at the end”
Econ175

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Bad grammar and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessment fairness. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“Bad grammar and .”

⚖️ Assessment Fairness

48/100

“some of the .”

👍 Positive Support

35/100

“ and all concerns and questions I had”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and all concerns and questions I had
  • Bad grammar and .
  • Gave a , but had an unmentioned 3 part fill in the blank question at the end

Theme 2

📝

  • some of the .
  • Bad grammar and .
  • There was no reference for how to phrase the 3 answers either.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only three recent online reviews exist, and one is strongly positive while two are strongly negative.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

Econ1753 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values