AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Warren Carter

HUM100 · BVP101 · HUM101 · BVPPROGRAM · BVP120 · BVP122 · BVP162 · DMG160 · DM10050605 · HUM110 · BVP100 · DM102 · DM160 · BVP200 · BVP · HUMG101 · DM200 · DM100 · DM002 · BVP160 · DM140 · 52 lifetime ratings

AI rating
13/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
14.29%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

unless you specifically want a strict broadcasting instructor and , and a rough classroom style.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganizedTough GraderRudeHeavy WorkloadMandatory Attendance
  • Most students describe Carter as .
  • Grades are often seen as harsh or arbitrary, with and .
  • A minority of students value his industry experience and strict real-world standards.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

An A is possible in some sections, but many students describe , and heavy effort.

Online evidence is sparse but negative, while and attendance pressure.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The course content is not always intellectually hard, but poor structure and should.

Online difficulty comes from disorganization, while in-person , and classroom pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Multiple in-person reviews say attendance or punctuality affects grades and late arrivals are penalized or shamed.

, while online reviews do not clearly establish an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students do not recommend him because they report , and little useful teaching.

Both formats are negative, but and more detailed evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call him a and describe grading as .

Format shift

, while in-person reviews more often describe harsh or inconsistent grading.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Several reviews describe lots of heavy project expectations.

Format shift

Online work is reading, videos, scripts, and essays, while , and field requirements.

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Most comments criticize his organization, attitude, clarity, and support, though a minority praise his knowledge and industry experience.

Format shift

Online teaching is criticized for disorganization, while and harsh classroom behavior.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears mixed across , and field activities.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize essays and scripts, while in-person , and field trips.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

47 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly harsh, with repeated complaints about rude behavior, tough grading, poor structure, and .

Main concern

The main concern is a stressful classroom environment with and .

What students said

“He is heartless & evil. Save yourself.”
DM160
“He is terrible at explaining and his lectures are boring.”
DM100
“ and if you miss row call you're going ”
HUM101

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are negative overall, citing confusing grading, technical issues, poor organization, and no recommendation.

Main concern

The main concern is disorganization and .

What students said

“ ; you have to guess what he expects.”
DM102
“assignments were frequently published accidentally or accidentally not published or on the wrong date”
DMG160
“ ”
DMG160

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam and assessment risk is high because students report tough tests, weekly testing in , and .

Tough TestsAttendance PointsWeekly Tests In Some SectionsOnline Timed QuizzesUnclear Exam Expectations

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

timed quizzes, and attendance points, but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

Tough TestsWeekly TestsOnline Timed QuizzesAttendance Points
“ . Too much material and no review either”
HUM100
“there's always a about 200 points or so”
HUMG101
“ .”
HUM101

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do yourself a favor and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“There is zero structure and most of what is taught is done through you tube videos.”

⚖️

18/100

“ ; you have to guess what he expects.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

18/100

“Do yourself a favor and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is terrible at explaining and his lectures are boring.
  • . Repetitive. Boring class full of "buzzwords" like someone else said.
  • He's a really good teacher who keeps you interested in the subject because he really cares about what he teaches.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • This teacher grades as if we are Harvard students, literally!
  • No class syllabus, doesn't know software, barely one step ahead
  • so you can improve.

Theme 3

🚪

  • and if you miss row call you're going
  • Gives attitude if you walk in late.
  • Yells and denigrates students - seems to enjoy making students miserable.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

52

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is highly credible because 50 reviews over many years show repeated patterns of , and poor student experience.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 511
3 out of 57
2 out of 514
1 out of 517

Course coverage

HUM1017 reviews
DM1005 reviews
DM1405 reviews
BVP1014 reviews
BVP1203 reviews
Show 16 more courses
DM2003 reviews
DMG1603 reviews
HUM1003 reviews
BVP1002 reviews
BVP1222 reviews
DM1602 reviews
HUMG1012 reviews
BVP1 review
BVP1601 review
BVP1621 review
BVP2001 review
BVPPROGRAM1 review
DM0021 review
DM100506051 review
DM1021 review
HUM1101 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 2