AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Bobby Ojose

MATH160 · STATS112 · G160 · MATHG160 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
80/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
63.64%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

Take him if you can attend consistently and learn from notes, but if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear grading criteriaAttendance mattersExtra creditFast lecturesCan be dismissive
  • Grades are very reachable if , and study the packets.
  • Teaching reviews are mixed because many praise his clarity while others say he is fast or dismissive with questions.
  • Attendance and participation strongly affect success.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

An A is very reachable through attendance, notes, homework, packets, participation, and , but it is not effortless.

The Easy A evidence , while the lone online review gives no grade detail.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The course content is usually manageable with and packets, though math concepts and fast lectures can still challenge weaker students.

, while the online review is too vague to judge course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

as graded or essential for passing and for .

, while the online review gives no attendance evidence.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and easy paths to an A, but several warn about his attitude and fast explanations.

Recommendation is positive in person but the single online review is negative and unsupported.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grading appears lenient because students cite , , formula support, and exams based on notes or packets.

Format shift

useful online grading detail.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

, and packets, which is steady but usually manageable.

Format shift

, while the online review gives no workload evidence.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Many students find his notes clear and practical, but some say he lectures too fast and .

Format shift

but mostly useful, while the online review is too short to assess teaching.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades , and exams rather than relying only on tests.

Format shift

In-person comments mention , and exams; online assessment details are not provided.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students often say the class is manageable or easy if , and study his packets.

Main concern

Students who need detailed explanations or .

What students said

“ . You'll easily get an A.”
G160
“ if you ask questions.”
MATH160

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is very negative but gives almost no detail.

Main concern

The online evidence is too vague to diagnose the problem.

What students said

“Would never use again.”
MATH160

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is student-friendly because packets and one mentions formula support.

Tests Based On NotesPacket-Based ExamsFormula SupportQuizzes Online

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or and one review says formulas were allowed on the board.

Tests Based On NotesPacket-Based ExamsFormula SupportFinal Mentioned
“Basically, the problems on the notes are the problems on the tests.”
MATH160
“He let us put the formulas on the board.”
MATH160
“The the exams so study them.”
G160

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . You'll easily get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ . and precise notes.”

📈 Grade Path

84/100

“Gives out a lot for showing and participating.”

⚠️ Main Risk

45/100

“He goes over lectures super fast. and won't spend extra time on it to make sure you got it before moving on to the next.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He made it simple enough to understand Stats.
  • He does lectures fast and very clearly.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • You'll easily get an A.
  • Gives out a lot of making it hard to fail.
  • , so make sure you show up every day.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Support

  • if you ask questions.
  • There are many students who he shuts down many times for asking questions.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

There are 11 reviews across several years with , and mixed teaching style.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH1604 reviews
G1603 reviews
MATHG1602 reviews
STATS1122 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

2

B+ 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1