AI Rate Professor

Not Specified

Tasha Chambliss

COSMG024 · COSMETOLOGYI · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can handle a and learn well under pressure.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderTest HeavyLots of HomeworkCondescending ToneAccountability Focused
  • Recent reviews are strongly negative, describing poor teaching, harsh tone, and unsupported tests.
  • Older positive reviews say she is thorough, challenging, and can teach a lot to motivated students.
  • The course is in person only and appears test-heavy, workload-heavy, and hard to get through.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some students earned A+ grades, but , and test-heavy expectations.

All evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The material and as tough, with some students saying they were tested on things not clearly taught.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently frame the course as challenging.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly .

In-person , and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Recommendation is low because recent students strongly criticize , and test alignment.

All recommendation evidence is in person, with older positives outweighed by recent negatives.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Multiple tags call her a , and several students report difficult or unfair test expectations.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Repeated tags mention lots of homework, and students describe heavy note-taking, testing, and studying demands.

Format shift

Workload evidence is entirely in person.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Positive comments call her thorough, but recent reviews repeatedly describe her as uncaring, condescending, and ineffective.

Format shift

The in-person evidence is mixed but leans strongly negative, with no online evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

Reviews repeatedly describe the class as and and books.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but lean negative, with repeated complaints about harsh treatment, heavy work, and tests on material students felt was not taught.

Main concern

Students most often complain that she is condescending and .

What students said

“She constantly brings our class down, treats us as if we're unintelligent, and teaches us nothing of use.”
COSMG024
“ .”
COSMG024
“ and easy to pass with some studying (quizlets helped because they were phrased the same as the test).”
COSMG024

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The class appears test-heavy, and reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyStraightforward Tests With StudyingMidterm And Final Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyMidterm And Final Mentioned
“ and easy to pass with some studying (quizlets helped because they were phrased the same as the test).”
COSMG024
“those notes are your only material that you will have to study of for and final!”
COSMG024
“ .”
COSMG024

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She constantly brings our class down, treats us as if we're unintelligent, and teaches us nothing of use.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“She doesn't teach you anything, constantly tears her students down, and makes you feel unintelligent for asking questions.”

⚖️

25/100

“ .”

🧪

90/100

“ and easy to pass with some studying (quizlets helped because they were phrased the same as the test).”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She constantly brings our class down, treats us as if we're unintelligent, and teaches us nothing of use.
  • She doesn't teach you anything, constantly tears her students down, and makes you feel unintelligent for asking questions.
  • She was very thorough with the information she provided and the texts we needed to look at.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • and easy to pass with some studying (quizlets helped because they were phrased the same as the test).
  • Very tough. You will learn a lot. Be a sponge.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She cared about the success of her students and was friendly.
  • Treats you like a child and rolls her eyes as if you're an inconvenience.
  • A real gem in the Cosmetology program!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because and show repeated themes, though opinions are polarized.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 54

Course coverage

COSMG0246 reviews
COSMETOLOGYI1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values