AI Rate Professor

English

Idalith Bustos

ENG100 · ENG90 · ENGL100 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
69/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
70%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take Bustos if and critical theory, but if you dislike participation and ideological debate.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDiscussion drivenCaring and energeticReading heavyParticipation mattersIdeology sensitive
  • Most positive reviews praise Bustos as caring, energetic, and .
  • The class requires reading, papers, participation, and comfort with critical theory topics.
  • A minority of students strongly disliked the political or theory-heavy focus and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Good grades are common for students who read, participate, and write, but papers, strict effort expectations, and A.

In-person evidence is more balanced and often positive, while the single and papers.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course content is accessible for engaged readers but can feel difficult because of , and discussion expectations.

Online feedback calls the theory focus repetitive, while and frustration with the course themes.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

Participation and , though reviews do not prove a .

In-person reviews repeatedly stress participation, while the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and strong discussions, but a few strongly object to the content, grading, or online experience.

, while the only online review says not to take the class unless you care about critical theory.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Grades can be good with effort, but tough-grader tags and .

Format shift

, and the online review tags her as a .

Workload

Moderate

43/100

Students mention , and a final, though some say the workload is manageable.

Format shift

The online review emphasizes lots of homework and papers, while and participation.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

, and energy, but several negative reviews call the class repetitive or biased.

Format shift

, while the single online review is negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears to , and a final.

Format shift

, and a final, while online reviews only mention reading and homework broadly.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed but mostly positive, with many students , and lecture energy.

Main concern

Students must keep up with readings, papers, and participation, and some dislike the political content.

What students said

“She is a caring professor and .”
ENGL100
“ and expects them to be read before class.”
ENGL100

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The lone online review is negative and says the class repeats critical theory discussions without much learning.

Main concern

The online class may feel repetitive and theory-heavy.

What students said

“We do not really learn much in this class.”
ENGL100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention a midterm and final but do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Midterm MentionedFinal MentionedPaper Based Work

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a final, but do not clearly prove exam rules or proctoring style.

Midterm MentionedFinal MentionedThree Papers
“Theres 3 papers, a midterm, and a final.”
ENGL100

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She does an amazing job at analyzing texts and leading the students into a that day.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course fit. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“She brings lots of energy into her lectures making them super interesting!”

👍 Recommendation Fit

70/100

“ !”

📚 Workload Reality

43/100

“ and expects them to be read before class.”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has informative lectures and .
  • She does an amazing job at analyzing texts and leading the students into a that day.
  • She brings lots of energy into her lectures making them super interesting!

Theme 2

📚

  • Participation is important; Answering one question a week is enough for a 100%
  • If you dont do the homework. .
  • She will call on people if they do not participate as much.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fit & Concerns

  • Her class will be very difficult for you if you don't have her same views.
  • We do not really learn much in this class.
  • , but she took 8 weeks to grade an essay.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Ten reviews across several years give detailed and consistent themes, though opinions are polarized.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ENGL1007 reviews
ENG1002 reviews
ENG901 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 2 · A 2

B range

4

B 4

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values