AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Dwan Huynh

MATH · G010 · MATH010 · G120 · MATHG100 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
3/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid Dwan Huynh unless you are prepared to self-teach the course and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor ExplanationsHeavy HomeworkSelf Teaching RequiredRude SupportTest Heavy
  • Every review gives the lowest quality rating and describes serious teaching problems.
  • Students repeatedly say they had to teach themselves because .
  • , and MathLab are described as excessive and frustrating.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Even when the material is described as , and weak support make grades costly.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The math content itself may be manageable, but and mismatched tests make the course feel harder than the material should be.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly establish a , though students mention labs, tutors, and access restrictions.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, and there is .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

3/100

because they report poor teaching, rude responses, and little useful help.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students describe grade concerns, lockouts, selective , and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Reviews repeatedly mention excessive MathLab , and online work.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Students consistently say she explains poorly, makes mistakes, gives little help, and sends students elsewhere for support.

Format shift

All because there are no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

, and online MathLab work.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are uniformly negative, , and unsupported self-teaching.

Main concern

The main concern is that students feel they must learn the material without effective teaching support.

What students said

“she is not great at explaining or teaching.”
MATHG100
“Does not teach you teach self.”
MATH010

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students say tests and and access can be restricted.

Tests Not Covered In LecturesTake-Home Tests MentionedQuizzes Same DayTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention tests not covered in lectures, same-day quizzes, and , but do not clearly prove proctoring or .

Tests Not Covered In LecturesTake-Home Tests MentionedQuizzes Same Day
“ .”
G010
“will have you take a .”
MATH010

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The actual material is easy, but expect to have to teach yourself how to do most of it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

8/100

“ so far.”

📚 Workload Pressure

10/100

“Gives wayyy too many questions for homework.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

3/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is not great at explaining or teaching.
  • Makes lots of mistakes, Poor teaching skills

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • this class is the reason my gpa is so low.
  • Picks and chooses who gets to do .

Theme 3

🧾 About Workload

  • Uses math lab excessively.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only 8 reviews, but they are detailed and unusually consistent across years.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH0103 reviews
MATHG1002 reviews
G0101 review
G1201 review
MATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1