AI Rate Professor

Economics

Emmanuel Tolentino

ECONG170 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can manage a and do not need fast instructor support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor communicationSelf-paced onlineEasy to passSlow grading
  • and communication are the biggest risk.
  • Students can earn an A by following modules and completing routine work.
  • Teaching presence is inconsistent, with some students feeling they learn mostly from the book.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Getting an A appears realistic if students keep up with , and exams, but support problems can add risk.

All evidence comes from Online reviews, with no In person reviews available.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The work is routine and module-based, but students still need to read and .

All course difficulty evidence comes from Online ECONG170 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

92/100

Zoom is explicitly not required, and the class appears asynchronous.

, and they support flexible participation.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students split between easy-passing praise and and poor communication.

Recommendation evidence is entirely Online and sharply mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Three of four analyzed students reported A grades, and comments say .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

61/100

The class , and a video essay, but students describe it as not too heavy.

Format shift

Only Online workload evidence is available.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Some students call him good, but major comments , and poor responsiveness.

Format shift

Only Online teaching evidence is available.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and a video essay.

Format shift

Only Online assessment evidence is available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews show an easy structure but unreliable communication and .

Main concern

The main concern is delayed or absent responses to messages and .

What students said

“ !”
ECONG170
“Just follow modules and you will be easy to pass.”
ECONG170

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention three exams but do not clearly prove the .

Three ExamsOnline Exams Not Clearly Described

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online reviews mention three exams but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Three ExamsPolicy Not Clearly Proved
“There are 3 exams in total”
ECONG170

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor doesn't seem to care about teaching at all.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and communication. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“Professor doesn't seem to care about teaching at all.”

📈 Easy Passing Path

82/100

“Just follow modules and you will be easy to pass.”

⚠️ Communication Risk

30/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Presence

  • He doesn't give any feedback, I feel like you are basically just learning from the online book.
  • Professor Tolentino is a good teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • This class has 1 weekly discussion board and around 2-4 homework assignments (mostly 2) that are assigned from Cengage.
  • Discussion is not too difficult and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is moderate because there are only four reviews, but they are recent enough and consistently identify the same online-course structure and communication risk.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ECONG1704 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1