AI Rate Professor

Art

Kari Duffield

ART106 · G100 · ARTG100 · ART100 · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
95/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

Her online classes are strongly recommended for students willing to read, follow study guides, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring instructorEasy A onlineReading requiredExtra creditClear structure
  • Online students overwhelmingly describe her as , and responsive.
  • Most online reviews report an easy A when students use study guides and complete discussions.
  • The and Lockdown Browser quizzes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

Online reviews repeatedly describe an easy A through study guides, quizzes, discussions, and , though the .

Online evidence strongly supports an easy A, while the single In .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

74/100

The content is accessible and well guided, but reading, research-based discussions, and .

Online reviews mostly call the course manageable, while the only In person review says it is harder than expected.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

Online structure appears weekly and module-based, but participation and .

Online reviews emphasize weekly required work, while the In .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Most students recommend her because , and gives a .

Online recommendations are very strong, while the single In person review is a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Online grading is often described as fair or easy with , but .

Format shift

Online reviews support lenient or , while the single In .

Workload

Moderate

64/100

Students report weekly quizzes, discussions, reading, and occasional projects, but many say the work is manageable.

Format shift

Online workload is steady but manageable, while the In .

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Most students describe her as , and effective online.

Format shift

Online teaching reviews are highly positive, while the single In person review focuses on grading concerns rather than teaching quality.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

, and projects rather than major exams.

Format shift

Online assessments are mostly quizzes and discussions, while the In .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single in-person review is negative and , and Respondus LockDown Browser quizzes.

Main concern

The and .

What students said

“She grades very strictly”
ART100
“All the .”
ART100

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are very positive, with , and a manageable path to an A.

Main concern

The main , and discussions.

What students said

“This is one of the easiest classes I've ever taken so far.”
ART100
“There shouldn't be a reason to not get an A.”
G100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence varies because online reviews often describe quizzes and no exams, while the .

Weekly QuizzesNo Exams In ART106Respondus LockDown Browser In One In Person Review

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The single In person review explicitly says quizzes require Respondus LockDown Browser.

Respondus LockDown BrowserWeekly Quizzes
“All the .”
ART100

Online

Online reviews mention weekly quizzes and one review , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, LockDown Browser, or open-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesNo Exams In ART106Policy Not Clearly Proved
“There are weekly quizzes but .”
ART106
“ .”
ART100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy A either way and lets you learn depending on personal level of interest.”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“Mrs. and sweet!”

📈 Easy A Path

88/100

“There shouldn't be a reason to not get an A.”

⚖️

82/100

“You have to try on the assignments if you want a good grade, but she grades fairly.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's an inspirational teacher and it's a fun class if you like art!
  • and .
  • Instructor Kari and was always commenting encouraging feedback on some of the assignments.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • and discussions take almost no effort at all as well.
  • If you answer all the questions from her study guide verbatim from the textbook you'll get an easy A.
  • The so as long as you type something meaningful, you get an A.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Workload & Rules

  • Discussions are the worst - 300 word requirement, & research.
  • There is 1 quiz and 1 discussion for each chapter.
  • All the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 10 reviews give consistent online detail across several years, though .

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART1007 reviews
ART1061 review
ARTG1001 review
G1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 1 · A 5 · A- 1

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1