AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

San Khong

CHEM110 · CHEM225 · G110 · CHEM220 · CHEMG110 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
28.57%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Consider him for in-person chemistry if you can handle hard work, but be cautious with online sections because the workload and lecture clarity draw heavy complaints.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy homeworkLong confusing lecturesNice but demandingBetter in personTest heavy
  • Online reviews are strongly negative because of , and confusing explanations.
  • , and clarity despite organic chemistry difficulty.
  • The overall experience depends heavily on format, with .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

Grades require sustained work because reviews describe chemistry as tough and the online workload as heavy, with little evidence of easy A grading.

Online reviews suggest a high-effort grade path, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Chemistry content is inherently tough, and online students say overlapping units, long lectures, and .

Online evidence is much more challenging, while help and effort.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

Reviews , but tags and comments suggest skipping lectures or labs would hurt performance.

Online reviews stress keeping up with lectures and deadlines, while not pass.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students recommend him in person for patience and feedback, but most because of workload and .

In-person reviews are positive, while online reviews are mostly negative and drive the overall caution.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

42/100

There is little evidence of , but is described as limited and the workload makes grades hard to earn.

Format shift

Online reviews focus , while in-person reviews suggest fair outcomes for students who ask questions and work.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Online students repeatedly , and very long lectures.

Format shift

Online workload is described as overwhelming, while but more acceptable.

Teaching experience

Average

54/100

He is described as nice, caring, and patient, but online lectures .

Format shift

Teaching quality appears much better in person than online.

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

, and exams, making assessment mixed but .

Format shift

Online reviews clearly mention weekly homework, labs, quizzes, and exams, while and concept support.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are positive, describing him as , and .

Main concern

The main concern is that the chemistry content is still tough and requires steady work.

What students said

“I heard he was tough, which he was, but not in a bad way.”
CHEM225
“Dr. and good at explaining things.”
CHEM220
“If you ask him questions and put in the work, I got a B without tryin too hard.”
CHEM225

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews describe extreme workload, long or , and overlapping assignments.

Main concern

Students say the online class demands too much time and is .

What students said

“3 hw, a .”
CHEMG110
“Super cool guy but my goodness his class is way too much.”
G110
“EXTREME AMOUNTS OF HOMEWORK AND PACKETS.”
CHEM110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course has frequent quizzes or exams plus labs and homework, but reviews do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam requirements, Lockdown Browser, or strict proctoring.

Weekly Quiz Or ExamTest HeavyLabsHomework Packets

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, book policy, proctoring, midterm, or final structure.

Online

Online reviews mention a and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or final rules.

Quiz Or Exam Per WeekTest HeavyLabs
“3 hw, a .”
CHEMG110
“There are a lot of packets and .”
CHEM110
“EXTREME AMOUNTS OF HOMEWORK AND PACKETS.”
CHEM110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Super cool guy but my goodness his class is way too much.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in format differences, workload, teaching clarity, and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“EXTREME AMOUNTS OF HOMEWORK AND PACKETS.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

54/100

“Dr. and good at explaining things.”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“ .”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Format

  • you will be turning in while trying to study for the .
  • his recorded lectures end up being like 5 hours long.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Difficulty

  • 3 hw, a .
  • There are a lot of packets and .
  • Ochem is tough!

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and nice.
  • .
  • He does a really good job of explaining the concepts and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because only 7 reviews are available, but the online and and internally consistent.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM1102 reviews
CHEMG1102 reviews
CHEM2201 review
CHEM2251 review
G1101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2