AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Angela Gomez-Hollbrook

DA115 · DARTG150 · 92809A · DART115 · C116B · CRN60856 · DARTG115 · DGA150 · DARTG177 · DART150 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
44/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if , and independent learning.

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedHeavy homeworkSelf-teaching requiredKnowledgeable but demandingInconsistent support
  • Many recent reviews describe unclear instruction, disorganization, and needing to teach yourself.
  • Workload is often heavy, especially with , and lesson reviews.
  • Older positive reviews say she is knowledgeable and can push motivated design students to improve.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible, but reviews , and needing strong independent effort.

Online includes one A with severe confusion and one fair but heavy class, while portfolio work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The material is not always intellectually impossible, but and advanced expectations make the course feel hard.

Online difficulty is driven by disorganization and homework, while and demanding design work.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as important, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

In-person reviews mention attendance importance, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

34/100

Most negative reviews warn about confusion, poor organization, and having to teach yourself despite some older strong praise.

Online recommendation is sharply mixed, while but include older positive experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

reviews to tough and .

Format shift

Online reviews include both fair grading and wasted effort, while in-person reviews , and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Multiple students describe lots of , and significant effort.

Format shift

Both online and in-person reviews mention substantial homework or project workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Students often describe scattered , and limited help, balanced by older praise for expertise.

Format shift

Online teaching is inconsistent, while and direct instruction.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize homework, projects, discussions, videos, textbook work, and portfolio output more than exams.

Format shift

Both formats appear assignment-heavy, with online reviews especially noting discussions and textbook or module work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews more often describe disorganized teaching, weak support, heavy work, and self-teaching, though some older students learned a lot.

Main concern

and limited direct teaching.

What students said

“Only reason I passed was YouTube.”
DART150
“LOTS OF HOMEWORK”
DGA150
“Through all the headaches I learned a lot, and had a .”
DARTG177

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online evidence is split between one very negative Photoshop review and one positive review that .

Main concern

Online organization and responsiveness appear inconsistent.

What students said

“Her Photoshop 2 class is the .”
C116B
“There is a lot to learn and a significant amount of homework, but she is fair.”
92809A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, webcam use, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Online

Online reviews .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be prepared to teach yourself or really really try to follow what she's saying.”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“She's has trouble explaining the course material.”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“LOTS OF HOMEWORK”

👍 Recommendation Risk

34/100

“I feel like I've wasted my time and money.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures were scattered, constantly stopping to talk about her kids.
  • Lectured out of the book. Showed videos. Little input.
  • This instructor is so disorganized and flip-flops so often throughout the instruction, you don't know if your coming or going.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but if you really want to learn the material, you're on your own.
  • Demanding & expects a lot out of you.
  • Just go to class and put a 100% in your work and she will get you that A.

Theme 3

🧠 About Learning Value

  • Through all the headaches I learned a lot, and had a .
  • I didn't really learn anything in her class unfortunately.
  • She keeps us wanting to know more about typography and and pushes you to pass.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 14 reviews across many years and courses, with repeated themes about organization, workload, and independent learning.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

DA1152 reviews
DART1502 reviews
DARTG1502 reviews
DGA1502 reviews
92809A1 review
Show 5 more courses
C116B1 review
CRN608561 review
DART1151 review
DARTG1151 review
DARTG1771 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1