AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Jody Butler

PSCI100 · PSYCH100 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can manage weekly work, but the online experience appears inconsistent.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGood FeedbackClear CriteriaWeekly WorkMixed Online ExperienceTough Grading Risk
  • Two students praise her feedback, encouragement, and .
  • One online review is , and grading.
  • The course rewards steady study and weekly work rather than effortless completion.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

An A is possible with steady weekly work, but mixed grades and one tough online review show it is not a free A.

The in-person review sounds easier, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The class is not described as conceptually extreme, but students must study and keep up with regular work.

, while online evidence is more mixed.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, though one student received flexibility through an extension.

The only concrete flexibility evidence is from the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

and support, but one online student strongly warns against her teaching.

In-person evidence is positive, while online evidence is sharply divided.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Clear criteria and , but one review calls her a .

Format shift

and manageable, while one online review reports tough grading.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Weekly due dates and papers create steady work, but the workload is not always described as overwhelming.

Format shift

The in-person review says weekly work was manageable, while one .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

and encouragement, but one review criticizes communication and teaching quality.

Format shift

The in-person review is positive, while online reviews are split between excellent and poor.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews , and few graded items rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The and says weekly work was manageable with .

Main concern

There is something due every week.

What students said

“Something due every week of the class, but she gave me an ”
PSYCH100

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split between strong support and severe criticism about communication and feedback.

Main concern

Online students may face inconsistent communication and .

What students said

“She was good with and very encouraging.”
PSYCH100
“Regularly fails to communicate what they desire in the students”
PSCI100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The , proctoring, open-book rules, or final structure.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She was good with and very encouraging.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She was good with and very encouraging.”

⚖️

55/100

“Regularly fails to communicate what they desire in the students”

📚 Workload Pattern

50/100

“Something due every week of the class”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was good with and very encouraging.
  • Regularly fails to communicate what they desire in the students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Something due every week of the class, but she gave me an
  • I felt that she gave us the materials to succeed but ultimately it was up to us to study.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Three reviews across both formats give useful but conflicting evidence.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSYCH1002 reviews
PSCI1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values