AI Rate Professor

Business

Donna McGovern

COMPSCI130 · ACCTG130 · ACCCTG130 · BUS108 · ACCT220 · ACCT130 · ACCT101 · 21 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if available, but unless you can work independently through unclear organization.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDisorganized OnlineHelpful In PersonTough GraderEasy In PersonPoor Online Support
  • Online reviews are strongly negative, citing , and .
  • as helpful, caring, and easy to pass with effort.
  • The course content is usually basic accounting or software work, but online execution makes the workload and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

In person can be an easy A with attendance and practice, but as tough and unforgiving.

Online evidence points to harsh grading, while follow directions.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

The material is usually basic accounting or software practice, but online confusion and .

In-person students call the course easy, while online students say disorganization makes basic material harder.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

42/100

because several reviews say students need to show up, follow directions, or keep up.

Online tags warn that skipping class hurts, while as useful for getting help.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is split sharply because online students warn against taking her, while .

Online reviews mostly say avoid her, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Online , and incorrect grading, despite some in-person claims of fairness.

Format shift

Online grading is the major complaint, while and .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

The workload is not always conceptually hard, but online students cite lots of , and schedule changes.

Format shift

Online reviews describe heavier and more chaotic work, while if students keep up.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Her in-person teaching is praised, but the larger online evidence describes poor organization, vague instructions, and weak responsiveness.

Format shift

In-person teaching is described as helpful and caring, while online teaching is described as disorganized and unhelpful.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and a final, so assessment appears mixed with some test-heavy online sections.

Format shift

Online sections mention quizzes, exams, and assignments more often, while and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students usually describe her as , and easy if students attend and keep up.

Main concern

The main concern is that lectures can be boring or fast-paced in compressed terms.

What students said

“ and knowledgeable.”
ACCT101
“Very easy class if you keep up with your work and be sure to raise your hand if you are stuck on something”
ACCT130
“Very easy A, just pay attention to what she goes over in lecture.”
COMPSCI130

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report disorganization, vague , and poor support.

Main concern

The and weak instructor response.

What students said

“Instructions are vague, AMBIGUOUS, and ”
ACCTG130
“Was so disorganized. Quizzes and .”
ACCT220
“ and constantly had to reopen them.”
ACCT130

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

complaints, pop quizzes, and exams that students felt did not match covered material.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesChallenging FinalUnclear Exam Coverage

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or closed-book policy.

Straightforward Tests
“ the homeworks.”
ACCT130

Online

Online reviews , and exam questions students felt were not from lectures or the textbook.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesChallenging FinalUnclear Exam Coverage
“Questions on the quizzes and .”
ACCTG130
“The ; it had material we never covered on it.”
ACCCTG130

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“THE .”

Voice snapshots generated from 21 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“AWESOME TEACHER! and knowledgeable.”

⚖️

28/100

“Professor was a .”

👍 Recommendation Split

38/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and knowledgeable.
  • Not a .
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy to get an A.
  • Professor was a .
  • Very easy A, just pay attention to what she goes over in lecture.

Theme 3

🧭 About Organization

  • Was so disorganized.
  • .
  • and constantly had to reopen them.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

21

Recent reviews read by the AI

21

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 21 reviews across many years with a consistent format split between negative online and positive in-person experiences.

Inside 21 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 58

Course coverage

ACCT13011 reviews
ACCTG1303 reviews
ACCCTG1302 reviews
ACCT2202 reviews
ACCT1011 review
Show 2 more courses
BUS1081 review
COMPSCI1301 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A- 1

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather not say 1