AI Rate Professor

College Courses

Connie Marten

COLL100 · G100 · COLLG100 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
45.45%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Take Connie Marten only if you want a demanding skills course and can , and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderHeavy HomeworkVague InstructionsFast Email RepliesHelpful If Asked
  • Students split sharply between those who value the challenge and those who find the and harsh.
  • Getting an A is possible, but it usually requires sustained work and .
  • Online reviews mention fast email replies more often, while and grading.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

An A is possible, but comments repeatedly say it takes hours of work, careful formatting, and .

Online evidence is mixed but still work-heavy, while requires major effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The material itself is not described as advanced, but and frequent assignments make the course feel harder.

Online students sometimes call the readings manageable, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though participation and class engagement appear important.

Online reviews mention participation and homework more than attendance, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

43/100

Some students appreciate the growth and responsiveness, but many warn against the class because of , and tone.

Online reviews are mixed with some strong praise, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Students frequently call her a and say low grades are not clearly explained.

Format shift

, but in-person complaints are more intense.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Many reviews describe lots of , and a workload hard for full-time or working students.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy work, with online reviews specifically mentioning three or four assignments per week.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Helpful and vague instructions, rude tone, and unclear expectations.

Format shift

Online students , while in-person students more often describe the teaching as .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention assignments, papers, quizzes, tests, and finals, so assessment appears .

Format shift

Online comments emphasize homework and weekly assignments, while , and finals.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

instructions, heavy work, condescending tone, and strict grading.

Main concern

Students and .

What students said

“Not specific on instructions given, very vague.”
COLLG100
“Don't get me wrong, an A is doable, but you'll have to WORK hours on end to earn it”
COLLG100

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and fast email replies, with mixed views on whether the course is worth it.

Main concern

Vague directions and .

What students said

“Professor Marten's class is easy if and do the assignments.”
COLLG100
“Learning material is great but .”
G100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The strongest exam evidence says students had to download spyware for feel strict.

Spyware RequiredTests And QuizzesFinals MentionedPolicy Not Fully Clear

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly say spyware was required for tests, quizzes, or finals, but .

Spyware RequiredTests And QuizzesFinals Mentioned
“She also requires you to download a .”
COLLG100
“Also she requires you to download spyware.”
COLLG100

Online

and do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or take-home policies.

Exam Topics Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't get me wrong, an A is doable, but you'll have to WORK hours on end to earn it”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Not specific on instructions given, very vague.”

⚖️

24/100

“Learning material is great but .”

📚 Workload

22/100

“You had to do with 3 or 4 assignments every week, but it was cool.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Connie is someone who will make you think!
  • Connie literally has no idea what she's and expects you to know what she wants.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • An A is doable, but you'll have to WORK hours on end to earn it
  • She is a very nice professor, however she is a ...
  • , but later when she grades them you will see that your grade is much lower than you thought.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • It was such a tough class with a lot of .
  • assigns loads of work that wouldn't be doable by any full-time student
  • There is a chapter a week of reading about 2 hours online.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews across several years show , and unclear instructions.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

COLLG10011 reviews
G1002 reviews
COLL1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 4 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1