AI Rate Professor

Criminal Justice

Greg Gibbs

CJ110 · CJG140 · CJ140 · CJINTRO · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
75%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

if you can follow instructions, keep up with discussions, and learn well from posted materials.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear instructionsDiscussion basedTextbook or PowerPoint drivenHelpful instructorEasy exams
  • Online , and exams.
  • Students generally earn high grades when they follow instructions and participate.
  • Teaching quality is mixed online because one student wanted more direct instruction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

A grades are common and as not difficult, but and instructions still matter.

Online evidence shows a structured easy A through quizzes and discussions, while and study.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The material appears approachable, but students must read, use PowerPoints, and keep up with recurring tasks.

Online reviews emphasize self-directed textbook or PowerPoint learning, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

as strictly mandatory, but participation and going to class are repeatedly emphasized.

Online participation is discussion-board based, while and participate.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

and helpfulness, though one online student disliked the lack of lectures.

Online reviews are more mixed because of limited lectures, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

All reported grades are A or A+, and students say quizzes and .

Format shift

Online grading looks especially manageable through PowerPoints and open-note work, while but thinner.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The course has weekly quizzes, discussions, a , and a final, but students do not describe it as hard.

Format shift

Online workload is clearly recurring and structured, while .

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students praise his clarity, experience, and helpfulness, but one online review reports too little direct instruction.

Format shift

Online teaching depends more on posted materials, while in-person comments sound more engaged and supportive.

Assessment method

Balanced

65/100

, and a final rather than relying on one method.

Format shift

Online reviews give the clearest assessment breakdown, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person-tagged reviews praise him as helpful, engaging, and .

Main concern

Students should attend, participate, and study rather than expect a no-effort class.

What students said

“His instructions are straight forward & engaging with him in the group discussions makes class fun.”
CJ140
“Go to class and be prepared to participate.”
CJINTRO

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe a manageable course built around open-note quizzes, discussions, PowerPoints, a , and a final.

Main concern

Some online students may feel there is not enough direct lecture or instructor guidance.

What students said

“ offered by him. All info learned from the textbook.”
CJ110
“Weekly 10 question T/F quizzes plus a discussion.”
CJ140
“All you need for the discussion posts, quizzes, midterm, and .”
CJG140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Online reviews mention open-note quizzes and multiple-choice exams, but .

Open-Note QuizzesMultiple Choice ExamsMidtermFinalNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

76/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book rules, or proctoring policies.

Online

Online and final, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book exam policies.

Open-Note QuizzesMultiple Choice MidtermMultiple Choice FinalNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Weekly quizzes and .”
CJ110
“There is also a midterm and .”
CJ140
“13 discussion posts, 14 quizzes, 1 term paper, 1 midterm, & 1 final.”
CJG140

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“All you need for the discussion posts, quizzes, midterm, and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“Professor Gibbs is a wonderful teacher.”

📚 Online Structure

62/100

“13 discussion posts, 14 quizzes, 1 term paper, 1 midterm, & 1 final.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“I loved this class, the and I enjoyed the discussions.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • offered by him. All info learned from the textbook.
  • His instructions are straight forward & engaging with him in the group discussions makes class fun.
  • He is always willing to help his students succeed.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I did well in his class though.
  • I loved this class, the and I enjoyed the discussions.
  • All you need for the discussion posts, quizzes, midterm, and .

Theme 3

💬 About Participation

  • Make sure and follow instructions.
  • Go to class and be prepared to participate.
  • all he requires of you is to interact in the .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews across both formats give useful patterns, but one format label conflicts with an online-course comment and some reviews are old.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CJ1402 reviews
CJ1101 review
CJG1401 review
CJINTRO1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values