AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Myrna Rasmussen

PSYCH118 · PHSYCHOLOGY100 · PSY118 · PSYCHG100 · PSYCH100 · PSYC100 · PSYCH160 · PSY100 · PSYCHG118 · PSYC118 · G118 · PYSCH100 · PSYG118 · PSYCG118 · G100 · PSYCHOLOGYG118 · 96 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
5.88%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

unless you are ready to teach yourself from the textbook and handle a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesTest heavyTough graderBook requiredMandatory attendance
  • Recent reviews are strongly negative and , and poor communication.
  • Grades often depend heavily on difficult tests, with students saying .
  • Some older reviews praise her humor and knowledge, but the overall recommendation signal is very weak.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly , and self-teaching.

The online review says self-teaching is needed, while tests and textbook reading.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course content becomes hard because lectures are often described as disorganized and .

Online evidence is sparse but negative, and and reading-dependent.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Many students say attendance matters or is mandatory, and .

Mandatory attendance evidence is almost entirely in-person, with review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Students often advise avoiding her because of , and weak communication.

Both formats are negative, but the online conclusion is based on only one review while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Many students , and grades based mainly on exams.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most grading evidence, while the .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, but the reading and test preparation burden is heavy.

Format shift

but , while the online review emphasizes self-teaching.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

and unclear, though some older students found her funny, knowledgeable, and helpful.

Format shift

The single online review is strongly negative, and in-person reviews are mixed but recently trend negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

Students repeatedly say , and .

Format shift

, while online evidence does not clearly describe assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed historically but , and harsh grading.

Main concern

while lectures and .

What students said

“Your grade .”
PSY100
“ but you won't learn a thing in her lectures”
PSY118
“She grades very heavily and ”
PSYCHG118

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is very negative and says the , and requires self-teaching.

Main concern

Students may need to teach themselves with .

What students said

“you basically have ”
PSY118
“ .”
PSY118

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students describe hard, test-heavy grading that often requires textbook study beyond lecture notes.

Test HeavyHard ExamsTextbook RequiredLimited Exam WindowsCurve Sometimes Mentioned

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews repeatedly describe difficult tests, , and one COVID online final opened for only 30 minutes.

Test HeavyHard ExamsTextbook RequiredLimited Final WindowCurve Sometimes Mentioned
“Your grade .”
PSY100
“ but only opened it up for 30 mins.”
PSY118
“ and long.. 100+ questions.”
PSYCH100

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“you basically have ”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and reading demands. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“ .”

🧪

25/100

“Your grade .”

👍 Recommendation Level

22/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Tends to go off on random tangents and never covers much material during lectures.
  • , and doesn't post the slides online to help students.
  • Honestly she was a great professor, she made the lecture engaging and interesting

Theme 2

🧪

  • The , and you must read the textbook to pass.
  • .
  • I took her class and she graded on the curve because over half of the class got below 60%.

Theme 3

📚

  • but you won't learn a thing in her lectures
  • You NEED to always read the book!
  • . Just exams. .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

96

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews span many years and contain detailed, recurring themes, though opinions vary by time period.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 537
4 out of 518
3 out of 514
2 out of 511
1 out of 516

Course coverage

PSYCH1189 reviews
PSY1186 reviews
PSYCH1005 reviews
G1184 reviews
G1003 reviews
Show 11 more courses
PSYC1183 reviews
PSYCH1603 reviews
PHSYCHOLOGY1002 reviews
PSY1002 reviews
PSYC1002 reviews
PSYCHG1002 reviews
PSYCHG1182 reviews
PSYCHOLOGYG1182 reviews
PSYG1182 reviews
PYSCH1002 reviews
PSYCG1181 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

4

B+ 3 · B 1

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

2

D+ 1 · D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1