AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Shoar Peggita

PSYCH118 · PSYC116 · PSYCG116 · PSY100 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
57/100
RMP rating
3.9/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you will attend, read, and keep up, but be cautious about online sections.

Best fit · Effort For RewardInteresting LecturesHomework HeavyReading RequiredMixed CommunicationFormat Split
  • In-person students often praise her lectures as interesting, caring, and memorable.
  • Workload can be heavy, with , and .
  • The only online review is very negative, citing disorganization, poor communication, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

61/100

Students say an A is possible if , and do the work, but it is not effortless.

In-person reviews describe effort-based success, while the .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The psychology content is understandable through engaging lectures, but , and .

because lectures help, while the online section sounds much harder due to organization problems.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Students explicitly say showing up and .

; the online review gives no attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

but the low would-take-again rate and severe online complaint create real caution.

, while the lone online review is a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

Grades appear achievable with , and reading, but the workload and .

Format shift

In-person grading sounds fair and effort-based, while and .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

Multiple reviews mention a ton of work, , and final.

Format shift

Both formats raise workload concerns, with the online review especially negative about complex assignments.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Her in-person teaching is often described as interesting and caring, but online organization and .

Format shift

Teaching evidence is positive in person but sharply negative online.

Assessment method

Balanced

66/100

Assessments , and a final, with neither exams nor assignments fully dominating.

Format shift

, and attendance, while online reviews emphasize quizzes and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive about her lectures and personality but still warn that , and .

Main concern

The and reading-heavy.

What students said

“Her lectures are interesting and interactive.”
PSYCG116
“Difficult class with a ton of work.”
PSYCG116
“READING AND !”
PSYCG116

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is strongly negative and describes the class as , and overloaded.

Main concern

Poor communication and .

What students said

“The .”
PSY100
“lots of .”
PSY100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are frequent and detail-focused, with one in-person review saying tests are open book but .

Chapter QuizzesMidtermFinalOpen Book Tests Mentioned In PersonReviews Do Not Prove Online Proctoring Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

56/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention quizzes, a 75-question midterm, a 75-question final, and one open-book test comment.

Chapter Quizzes75-Question Midterm75-Question FinalOpen Book Tests
“One quiz per chapter, one midterm 75 questions, one final 75 questions”
PSYCG116
“ !!!!”
PSYC116

Online

The but does not clearly prove webcam use, open-book rules, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring policy.

Detail-Heavy Quizzes
“tons of ”
PSY100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I learned a lot in the class, but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, online quality, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“Her lectures are interesting and interactive.”

📚 Workload Pressure

30/100

“Difficult class with a ton of work.”

👍 Recommendation Split

58/100

“The .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She loves her job and that makes her lectures so interesting.
  • Her lectures are interesting and interactive.
  • connects real life experiences to material which makes it easier to memorize.

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • Difficult class with a ton of work.
  • This class is super time consuming
  • lots of .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Exams

  • You can easily get an A if and go to class.
  • Do good on the quizzes because It's similar to the tests.
  • READING AND !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

64/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only 7 reviews and the online evidence comes from a single strongly negative review.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PSYCG1163 reviews
PSYC1162 reviews
PSY1001 review
PSYCH1181 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1